Tuesday, March 30, 2021

UPDATED: Former Chief Science Officer of Pfizer says massive "vaccination" roll-out is "Crime Against Humanity"...and other news

UPDATED:  March 31, 2021 Sentients are puzzling what to make of Dr. Vernon Coleman and some others spreading the alarmist theory expressed by former Bill and Melinda Gates employee Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche that the whole "vaccination" frenZy should be called off due to the possibility of the vaccinated spreading a lethal variant of the CovID-19 virus to the UNvaccinated.  Here is my response to such information sent my way by regular contributor Ed(itor). 

Hi Ed(itor)  The Dr. Vernon Coleman video about the vaxx referencing Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s theory of mass extinction has now been discredited by Dr. Michael Yeadon [please see interview below].  I wouldn’t disseminate that [Bossche] theory too far because, IMO, it has been seeded to divide the truth community.  Let’s dance with the guy who brung us this far...Dr. Michael Yeadon.




Sadly, if we were only dealing with Seven-Year-Olds we might not be experiencing this existential nightmare. Instead, we are dealing with pathologically brainwashed "CovIDians"

Good morning readers.  First up today is a Breaking News interview that took place yesterday with the former Chief Science Officer of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon.  Dr. Yeadon has now turned whistleblower on the coordinated Big Pharma Global effort to make trillion$ off the deaths of up to 90% of humanity and render the survivors into trans-humanized slaves under the control of robots [TM].

Yesterday, I informed readers that my developmentally disabled brother Paul has now been vaccinated.  While at that time I ASSuMED that it was the AstraZeneca Experimental Chimpanzee mRNA Gene Tampering injection that he received, late last night I received an e-mail from his Residential Service Provider stating that Paul was injected with the Pfizer Experimental Synthesized Aborted Fetus Gene-Tampering injection.

With that information being factored into the equation of how long my brother has to live [est. by several experts at between 14 to 18 months]  I present the following pivotal, landmark interview with former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Dr. Yeadon and will have more comments to follow:

******************

It’s ‘entirely possible’ vaccine campaigns ‘will be used for massive-scale depopulation’: Former Pfizer VP

Dr. Michael Yeadon

H/T Dennis

 Introduction by LifeSiteNews journalist Patrick Delaney.

March 29, 2020 (America’s Frontline Doctors) –  Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer, spoke with great urgency to America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) late last week warning that the drive to inject the largest possible portion of the population with experimental COVID-19 vaccines is “madness,” involves “evil,” includes “crimes against humanity” and may have the intention of “massive-scale depopulation.”

Yeadon’s comments are also made in the broader context of a sharp  debate over theories offered by Geert Vanden Bossche, a vaccine expert associated with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who, with the appearance of a “whistleblower” has also warned of a “global catastrophe without equal” due to the way these vaccines have been utilized.

In short, Vanden Bossche fears these experimental vaccines, which do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus, will foster the development of “dangerous variants” that will be far more lethal to the unvaccinated and vaccinated alike, who, for different reasons, will not have sufficient immunity to protect them.

In addition to the immediate halting of the current vaccination campaign, Vanden Bossche’s proposed solution is yet another worldwide vaccination of a different type.

While Yeadon also fears terrible consequences due to these vaccination campaigns, he strongly disagrees with Vanden Bossche’s theory, and with the proposed solution of more vaccination.

“I think the Geert Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect,” Yeadon said. “There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.”

Last December, Yeadon, a British national, filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to immediately suspend testing on these experimental vaccines due to many safety concerns, including pathogenic priming, which involves “an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, ‘wild’ virus after vaccination.”

In their white paper on the topic, AFLDS warned that such reactions, which can be fatal, “are difficult to prove,” as they are often interpreted as infection with “a worse virus,” or, perhaps, a more dangerous variant.

Having maintained that there is “no need of vaccines” for COVID-19, Yeadon emphasizes below, “PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.”

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said: “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population.

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.

“In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention.

“Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else. Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

INTERVIEWER: In a talk you gave four months ago, you said:

The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide.

The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they’re so similar; it’s cross immunity.

So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.

 

In other words, previous exposure to SARS – that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 – bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity.

The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures?

DR. YEADON: “What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2. The study is from one of the best labs in their field.

“So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not ‘high throughout’ and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K.

“However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits “for research” on scale, subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non-vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50% of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25% have been infected & are now immune.

“Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

INTERVIEWER: My understanding of a “leaky vaccine” is that it only lessens symptoms in the vaccinated, but does not stop transmission; it therefore allows the spread of what then becomes a more deadly virus.

For example, in China they deliberately use leaky Avian Flu vaccines to quickly cull flocks of chicken, because the unvaccinated die within three days. In Marek’s Disease, from which they needed to save all the chickens, the only solution was to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated were at high risk of death. So how a leaky vax is utilized is intention-driven, that is, it is possible that the intent can be to cause great harm to the unvaccinated.

Stronger strains usually would not propagate through a population because they kill the host too rapidly, but if the vaccinated experience only less-serious disease, then they spread these strains to the unvaccinated who contract serious disease and die.

Do you agree with this assessment? Furthermore, do you agree that if the unvaccinated become the susceptible ones, the only way forward is HCQ prophylaxis for those who haven’t already had COVID-19?

Would the Zelenko Protocol work against these stronger strains if this is the case?

And if many already have the aforementioned previous “17-year SARS immunity”, would that then not protect from any super-variant?

DR. YEADON: “I think the Geert Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect. There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.

“As a general rule, variants form very often, routinely, and tend to become less dangerous & more infectious over time, as it comes into equilibrium with its human host. Variants generally don’t become more dangerous.

“No variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence.

“It’s a fiction, and an evil one at that, that variants are likely to “escape immunity”.

“Not only is it intrinsically unlikely – because this degree of similarity of variants means zero chance that an immune person (whether from natural infection or from vaccination) will be made ill by a variant – but it’s empirically supported by high-quality research.

“The research I refer to shows that people recovering from infection or who have been vaccinated ALL have a wide range of immune cells which recognize ALL the variants.

This paper shows WHY the extensive molecular recognition by the immune system makes the tiny changes in variants irrelevant.

“I cannot say strongly enough: The stories around variants and need for top up vaccines are FALSE. I am concerned there is a very malign reason behind all this. It is certainly not backed by the best ways to look at immunity. The claims always lack substance when examined, and utilize various tricks, like manipulating conditions for testing the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies are probably rather unimportant in host protection against this virus. There have been a few ‘natural experiments’, people who unfortunately cannot make antibodies, yet are able quite successfully to repel this virus. They definitely are better off with antibodies than without. I mention these rare patients because they show that antibodies are not essential to host immunity, so some contrived test in a lab of antibodies and engineered variant viruses do NOT justify need for top up vaccines.

“The only people who might remain vulnerable and need prophylaxis or treatment are those who are elderly and/or ill and do not wish to receive a vaccine (as is their right).

“The good news is that there are multiple choices available: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroid used in asthmatics), and of course oral Vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin etc. These reduce the severity to such an extent that this virus did not need to become a public health crisis.”

INTERVIEWER: Do you feel the FDA does a good job regulating big pharma? In what ways does big pharma get around the regulator? Do you feel they did so for the mRNA injection?

DR. YEADON: “Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA. Always good quality interactions.

“Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body.

“So here is an example where the U.K. regulator has a conflict of interest.

“The European Medicines Agency failed to require certain things as disclosed in the ‘hack’ of their files while reviewing the Pfizer vaccine.

“You can find examples on Reiner Fuellmich’s ‘Corona Committee’ online.

“So I no longer believe the regulators are capable of protecting us. ‘Approval’ is therefore meaningless.

“Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I petitioned the EMA Dec 1, 2020 on the genetic vaccines. They ignored us.

“Recently, we wrote privately to them, warning of blood clots, they ignored us. When we went public with our letter, we were completely censored. Days later, more than ten countries paused use of a vaccine citing blood clots.

“I think the big money of pharma plus cash from BMGF creates the environment where saying no just isn’t an option for the regulator.

“I must return to the issue of ‘top up vaccines’ (booster shots) and it is this whole narrative which I fear will he exploited and used to gain unparalleled power over us.

“PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.

“As there’s no need for them, yet they’re being made in pharma, and regulators have stood aside (no safety testing), I can only deduce they will be used for nefarious purposes.

“For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world’s population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it.

“It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”

Reprinted with permission from America’s Frontline Doctors.


******************

Greencrow concludes:  Before getting into my conclusions I need to first "crow" that Dr. Yeadon agrees with my opinion, expressed on this blog that Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is full of hooey with his disinfo on the possibility of the covID-vaccinated transmitting a virus to the unvaccinated.  The greencrow is NOT a doctor but she sure has some wicked "street smarts"; )

This is not the first time Dr. Yeadon has spoken out publicly about the dangers of the Mass Globalist, Big Pharma Experimental Injection campaign.  I have posted interviews with him ever since the nightmare began more than a year ago.  Interestingly, Dr. Yeadon also spoke out against mass mRNA injections when the perpZ tried this stunt back in the late 1990's early 2000's with the H1N1 "swine" flu.  At that time there was such a chorus of experts condemning the project that it was shelved until they could get rid of some of the truth telling Doctors such as PCR Inventor Dr. Kary Mullis, as just one prominent example.  

Long time alternative readers will remember the mysterious series of sudden, often unexplained deaths of micro-biologists, naturopaths and science lab research professionals.  Now we have an inkling why so many unexplained deaths in such a specialized field took place.  Why, even Dr. Teresa Tam 'the man', Canada's Chief Hell-th Officer replaced a scientist, Dr. Frank Plummer, a "maverick", who died "suddenly of a heart attack" while travelling in Africa on February 4, 2020 just before the intensification of the Globalist lock downs in Canada.

Why they spared Dr. Yeadon [so far] we'll never know...but right now he's looking more and more like the famed New Orleans Prosecutor Jim Garrison...a professional "little dutch boy" holding back the entire force of the ocean [of Kennedy Assassination Lies/Crimes]...with his finger in the dike.  May the Good Lord watch over and protect Dr. Michael Yeadon.

Please Vote NO asap


Have your say: Should COVID-19 vaccinations be mandatory?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Votes: 25,211

15 comments:

FreakedOut said...

Good to see all the NO votes, but when push comes to shove(loss of FREEDOMS, Green Passports...etc[refer to IsraHELL]), how many will knuckle under and change their minds and get the jab?
How about a poll question like this:
"If ALL your Freedoms were restored and everything went back to normal IF you got the COVID Vax would you get it?"

greencrow said...

For me to submit to the Experimental mRNA injection, the oppression would have to get a LOT more intense than what's happening now, FreakedOut.

How about this scenario: I'm drugged with Rohypnol...strapped down and forcibly injected with the mRNA concoction by a squad of SWAT team commandos.

Naaawwwh....even then I would fight back and escape!

FreakedOut said...

Yeah Greencrow, I think you're in that "Angry Minority" Samuel Adams talked about in the quote I sent ya. :-O I'm with ya!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous(X) here:

Not sure this is constructive re Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche criticism...I see that it is creating many wedges in the truther community. Dr. Coleman discussed this in a recent video.

Lets be blunt, WE are ALL entering uncharted territory with "vaccination medical experiment" potentially employing billions of humanoid guineau pigs and all the literally infinite permutations and combinations of mutations etc. that may result.

ONE "bad" one could wipe us all out.

greencrow said...

Hi Anonymous [X]

My job as a truth blogger is to call "Bullshit" when I see and/or smell it. I am not supposed to "avoid creating wedges" by NOT speaking out. That is the razor wire I walk on every day when I assess the NewZ.

In this case, I spoke out the very day that Dr. Vanden Bossche did...which was highly risky...but then was supported by several others with far more knowledge of the situation than I.

Now here we have one of the TOP alternative experts saying that Vanden Bossche's "whistleblowing" could be a "trick" because it is unsupported by the science.

I will take my bow now.



CanadianNotCommunist said...

An excellent and very important article.

More pieces of the puzzle "clicked" together for me today.
I follow agriculture, and in agricultural news, the government is close to approving RNAi technology, for insecticide use. I then realized that the lipid nanoparticles Moderna and Pfizer are using to slip an mRNA molecule into the cell is being used to actually insert an siRNA molecule into the cells of humans by way of the COVID vaccine.
RNAi/siRNA is able to silence the target genes; the claim being that it can benefit patients by turning off mutated genes.

From globenewswire.com ;
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/01/28/2166110/0/en/The-Antisense-RNAi-Therapeutics-Industry-Played-A-Vital-Role-In-COVID-19-Vaccine-Development.html

For a detailed explanation;
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adhm.202001650

Truly experimental.
Do we trust them ?

Northerntruthseeker said...

I just voted at that "poll" at that rag called the 'Toronto Star' young lady, and I do want to see others that come here do so as well..

But you and I can see where this is going.. These pricks are going to ram these ' vaccines' into all of us, and their plans are to have those like you and I 100% vilified for our stance that these damn things are KILL SHOTS and nobody should be taking them period.

And thanks for the information on that important situation with how Yeaden feels about Vanden Bossche.... I too have been looking at both sides in that argument, and since I am a firm believer that this 'virus' in question does not even exist, I am still leaning on the idea that Geert has some kind of hidden agenda in all this.... As you and I have found, for Geert to come into this agenda so late in the game now does make us stop and ponder what his true intentions are..

greencrow said...

Hi CanadianNotCommunist:

What you have written in your comment above is absolutely mind-blowing! Sometimes I am totally overwhelmed at the path we've been placed on...sorting through this forest and mindfield of lies and traps for humanity.

I would like someone with a bit more understanding of technology/science to have a look at this. How about you, FreakedOut???

Here is the clue:

"... the government is close to approving RNAi technology, for insecticide use. I then realized that the lipid nanoparticles Moderna and Pfizer are using to slip an mRNA molecule into the cell is being used to actually insert an siRNA molecule into the cells of humans by way of the COVID vaccine.

RNAi/siRNA is able to silence the target genes; the claim being that it can benefit patients by turning off mutated genes.

From globenewswire.com ;
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/01/28/2166110/0/en/The-Antisense-RNAi-Therapeutics-Industry-Played-A-Vital-Role-In-COVID-19-Vaccine-Development.html

For a detailed explanation;
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adhm.202001650

Or anybody who wants to dive in...be my guest and put up a comment when you've read and analyzed the links above.

gc

greencrow said...

NTS says:

"...thanks for the information on that important situation with how Yeadon feels about Vanden Bossche.... I too have been looking at both sides in that argument, and since I am a firm believer that this 'virus' in question does not even exist, I am still leaning on the idea that Geert has some kind of hidden agenda in all this..."

What I would love to see happen, NTS, is a live debate on the Internet between Dr. Vanden Bossche and Dr. Yeadon. It would be a tremendous public service! Remember back in the old days of democracy when we used to have debates if there were differences of opinion? Then the strongest argument would prevail. Those days are gone. Now it's just a diet of pure lies/propaganda...and silence the opposition.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous(X) here:

Appears the "Soylent Green" cull is ramping up

On Global BC ...people 55 - 65 years old can line up for vaccine starting tomorrow.
Via some miracle...this age cohort wasn't tentatively scheduled till the summer.

Duly note the AstraZeneca will not be injected into those in BC UNDER 55...and BC is due to receive 200,000 doses of AstraZeneca from the 1.5 million doses donated to Canada from US(where AstraZeneca has NOT been approved). WTF????

Soooo...given documented problems with AstraZeneca ie blood clots...older people have immunity ????

Conclusion:
ANYONE in BC "55 and over" is effectively a combination "lab rat" and "dumping ground" for junk science vaccine. The script has flipped...as AstraZeneca was previously allocated to middle- age working class....and the Pfizer and Moderna allocated to the seniors group ?

Smell a rat???

Anonymous said...

Voted and propagated!

Pleasantly surprised about high antivax stance.
Great day today. Went to town to do necesary shopping. Stopped at few places and saw few people without masks and no harrasment whatsoever about me not wearing mask.

CanadianNotCommunist said...

Good idea putting the RNAi question out to the community for further investigation, Greencrow.
If it's not presently in the current crop of vaccines, it is something that's in the works, and we need to be aware of it.

It's beyond my level of knowledge to say whether RNAi technology could be used for something like disrupting the fertility of females in Africa (and elsewhere), for example.

greencrow said...

Hi CanadianNotCommunist:

You say:

"...It's beyond my level of knowledge to say whether RNAi technology could be used for something like disrupting the fertility of females...".

It's my general rule of thumb that if the PerpZ CAN do something...then they WILL do something. There is no compunction involved, ever.

greencrow said...

Anonymous said:

"Voted and propagated!"

Great! The more we stand up and be counted [literally] the more resistance is fueled. This is the final battle.

greencrow said...

Hi Anonymous [X]

"...people 55 - 65 years old can line up for vaccine starting tomorrow.
Via some miracle...this age cohort wasn't tentatively scheduled till the summer.

Duly note the AstraZeneca will not be injected into those in BC UNDER 55...and BC is due to receive 200,000 doses of AstraZeneca from the 1.5 million doses donated to Canada from US(where AstraZeneca has NOT been approved). WTF????"

I'm thinking of writing a bit more about AstraZeneca today. My spideys told me last night that it wasn't even a serious vaccine...at least here in North America which is GateZ Big Pharma territory. It's more being used as a "funnel" to give the illusion of choice but then as it is removed from the options...what's left? Pfizer and ModeRNA...of Course!

Also I saw a comment on Twitter yesterday that went something like this:

"What gives? AstraZeneca is not recommended for those over 65 and now it's not recommended for those under 55...so that's a ten year period when people won't be harmed by it...WTF."