Saturday, August 17, 2019

Why Doesn't Russia Pass an "Epstein Act"?

     Sergei Magnitsky  and Jeffrey Epstein, 
both died in their jail cells      

I'm sure the Russians are enjoying the irony of it similar the Epstein case and the Magnitsky case are.  Both men were high profile prisoners...both men were set to testify against powerful former mentors/clients....and both men died under dubious circumstances while in custody of their governments.

In the case of Sergei Magnitsky, the West, primarily the US, the UK... but even little "yes boy" Canada..have declared that the international fraudster Bill Browder's accountant Magnitsky [Browder falsely claims Magnitsky was a lawyer] was tortured and murdered by the Kremlin.  Russia denies the allegation.  But the Western countries all subsequently passed legislation sanctioning Russia for its supposed brutal treatment of a prisoner [Magnitsky] while in custody.  The legislation is called "The Magnitsky Act" and is dragged out any time the West wants to do a propaganda number on Russia.

LOL.  So, Why doesn't Russia pass an "Epstein Act" based on the brutal treatment that Jeffrey Epstein suffered at the hands [literally] of the person(s) who was allowed by the federal government of the United States to enter his cell and strangle Epstein in the middle of the night?  This legislation could be spearheaded by the lawyers for Epstein, who are now averring that they will conduct their own "independent" investigation, given all the glaring anomalies in the "official story".

Yes, in future, all the "Five Eyes" nations could be placed under sanction of "The Epstein Act" whenever "The Magnitsky Act" is dragged out of the woodwork.  Duelling Acts.  lol.

Ethics Report Reveals Massive Attempt to Deceive/Circumvent Cdn Atty General by Prime Minister Trudeau

Opposition Leader Scheer and 
Prime Minister Trudeau cross paths
at Acadia celebration yesterday

It actually kept me up last night.  I tossed and turned for hours thinking about the shocking revelations of the Ethics Commissioners' Report that was released last Wednesday in Ottawa.  Canadians knew it was bad...but we didn't know how bad.

Now, according to this analysis by National Post columnist Andrew Coyne we see that there was a calculated and sustained criminal attempt by the Prime Minister and members of his office to deceive and circumvent the Attorney General, Jody Wilson-Raybould.  Please read this snippet from his editorial and I will have more comments to follow:


"...What we have learned is that senior government officials were not just pressuring the former attorney general to interfere in a criminal proceeding, by the unprecedented means of overturning a decision of the independent director of public prosecutions: they were deceiving her.

They did so not only by keeping important information from her, but by providing her with misleading information. They acted, not only in concert with each other, but with officials at SNC-Lavalin, and they carried on this conspiracy to, in the commissioner’s words, “circumvent, undermine and ultimately attempt to discredit” the authority of the attorney general even as the company’s appeal of the DPP’s ruling was before Federal Court — a proceeding to which the attorney general, via the DPP, was a party.

It was known before how ferociously the company had lobbied various ministers and public officials, even after it had been charged, to insert a provision in the Criminal Code allowing it to escape prosecution: the famous remediation agreements. It was not known until now that it had been at the company’s suggestion that this was inserted in the 2018 budget implementation bill, the better to ensure that it could not be voted upon separately or even examined by the competent parliamentary committee.
Likewise, it was known that, after the DPP had ruled the company was ineligible, under the terms of the same legislation, for such an agreement, the company had swarmed the government to have her decision overturned. It was not known how fully, indeed eagerly, representatives of the prime minister, the finance minister, and the clerk of the privy council had participated in this campaign — in support, that is, of a private company, charged with serious crimes under the law, against the offices of government responsible for applying the law.

The ethics commissioner’s report describes their many, many meetings, and what was discussed: how the company shared the PowerPoint presentation in support of its case for remediation with Finance officials, who offered suggestions for how it might be improved; how supportive legal opinions the company had commissioned from two former Supreme Court justices, Frank Iacobucci (the company’s lawyer) and Jack Major, were circulated amongst senior government officials; how the company chairman, Kevin Lynch, formerly the clerk of the privy council, solicited the then-Clerk, Michael Wernick, for advice...."

"....This is not some junior clerk they were attempting to hoodwink. This was the chief law officer of Canada. The lawful way to proceed was clear: to respect the independence of the DPP, whose ruling was well within the law but was in any case within her discretion. Had the attorney general instead been bamboozled into overriding [the Director of Prosecutions], the effect would have been to substitute a decision grounded in law with a decision grounded in nothing but the self-interest of SNC-Lavalin and the political interests of the Liberal party...."

Greencrow says:  Yes, dear readers, contemplating the audacious and mendacious nature of the activities emanating out of the Office of the Canadian Prime Minister and directed at the Attorney General of Canada kept me awake last night.  To think that the Prime Minister allied himself with known, serial criminals in a sustained effort [so far in vain] to do an end run around the Attorney General...and around settled law and legal traditions going back shocking almost beyond belief.  Trudeau STILL thinks that his subversive alliance with the criminal corporation SNC Lavalin is the way to go.  If re-elected, he will no doubt consider that vindication...and award SNC Lavalin the "get out of jail free" DPA card that it literally pressured the Government of Canada to pass on its behalf. 

The question that kept me tossing and turning last night is this:  Is the RCMP up to the task of routing out these criminals from our body politic and legal institutions?  Knowing that the RCMP has shown itself to be corrupt in terms of the Nuttall/Korody "Travesty of Justice" here in BC...I have serious doubts on that score.  I am sure that Trudeau Crime Corp is pulling out all the stops as we an effort to derail the RCMP's inquiries in response to the Ethics Commissioner's resport.

Folks, suffice it to say that the Ethics Report has taken me from a place where I thought that le Dauphin was merely congenitally stupid and unfit to be Prime Minister...that he should be forced out of office and condemned to live off his government pension and inheritance..."clipping coupons" for the rest of his a very dark place where I now believe he should be tried on charges of conspiracy to commit corruption and obstruct justice and, if convicted, he should spend an amount of time in jail sufficient to allow reflection on how important the rule of law and the independence of the Attorney General really is in a "democracy".  Maybe that's the only way of getting it through his thick, arrogant skull!

Opposition Andrew Scheer calls for RCMP
Investigation of SNC Lavalin/PMO Scandal

Friday, August 16, 2019

The Second Assassination of Martin Luther King

Video text written by Matthew Ehret

Today I'd like to present for your viewing edification the above video that objects to the second assassination [reputational assassination] of 60's civil rights leader, the Reverend Martin Luther King.  This 'must watch' video not only makes the case that the self-styled "official biographer", David Garrow, is yet another "usual suspects" liar... and [I submit] probably a MosCIAd deep state asset...tasked with the perennial destruction of one of the three greatest leaders of the US who were assassinated by the Ziofascist Deep State during the 1960's.  President John F. Kennedy and his brother Former Attorney General, Senator Robert F. Kennedy are the other two of the trio of leaders who must be killed over, and over and over again by the Ziofascist globalist cabal that took over and occupied the United States in the 1960s and then, like a metastic cancer, spread to the entire West--now called "Five Eyes" occupied nations--after the 9/11 MosCIAd coup/atrocity.

Why must these three former leaders be assassinated over and over again?  Well, dear readers, watch the entire video above and you will get a major clue.  Listen to the actual words of Martin Luther King as he speaks to his fellow Americans.  The guy was a friggin' genius with words and conveying difficult philosophical and sociopolitical concepts to the masses.  He spoke of wanting to take the US to a higher level...of social equality and justice.  Just listen to him...and you'll know why he had to be killed physically and now his beliefs have to be killed over and over again by the slings and arrows of professional liars like the disinformation asset Garrow.

It's the same with JFK and RFK...they both pointed to an alternative to the military industrial complex road the Ziofacists wanted to drag America down.  Pull up a YouTube video that has either one of the murdered brothers speaking and you will hear speeches like you NEVER hear today...literate, judicious, philosophical, truthful.  The men have respect for their audience--and never sink to the level of name-calling or quasi-racism. They never "Tweeted" childish and provocative concepts in the middle of the night. Compare the words of MLK, JFK and RFK to any of the leaders of today, and especially to Trump, and you'll see why "they" have to keep killing them.

Yes, David Garrow has been tasked with re-murdering MLK--and attempting to bury MLJ's eloquent and inspirational words under a sodden and smelly wet blanket sprayed with Garrow's own piss-like lies.  Under no circumstances should succeeding generations of Americans have access to the WORDS/IDEALS of any of the three martyred men.  Satan says so. 

Thursday, August 15, 2019

Amid Corruption Scandal in the PMO....People's Party Leader Bernier denied right to debate

People's Party Leader Maxime Bernier
not allowed to participate in Leader's Debate

This morning I was going to write about the strange decision made recently by the PTB in the media not to allow the People's Party Leader to participate in the upcoming Canadian Federal Election Leaders Debates.  Here is the headline that appeared in News1130.  Please read and I will have more comments to follow:

Five parties invited to televised leaders' debates, Bernier left out for now

OTTAWA — The leaders of Canada’s five main political parties have been invited to take part in televised federal election debates this October, but the newly formed People’s Party of Canada has been left out for now.

Leaders of the Liberals, Conservatives, NDP, Bloc Quebecois and Green party have all been invited by the Leaders’ Debates Commission, the group responsible for organizing two televised debates.

The parties all met at least two of the three criteria for participation established last year by the federal government.

The commission says the People’s Party, founded and led by Quebec MP Maxime Bernier, met one of the criteria, but it did not yet have sufficient evidence to conclude the party had met a second.

To participate, Bernier will have to convince the commission through further submissions of evidence that his party has a “legitimate chance” of winning multiple seats this fall.

The deadline to file additional evidence is Sept. 9, and the debates are set for Oct. 7 and Oct. 10.

Why have the political parties and the media connived to prevent Maxime Bernier from participating in the debate?  You might well ask, in the extreme dearth of decent politicians to vote for in the upcoming October election.  Wouldn't it be nice to have at least one more to compare and choose from?  Hey, perhaps THAT is the reason.  Canadians must be shoehorned into choosing between a paltry group of half-baked and overbaked politicians.

I'm not saying that I'm going to vote for Maxime Bernier but I would like to hear what he has to say...particularly about why he fled the Conservative Party of Andrew Scheer and what he would have done differently had he won the leadership of the Conservative Party a few years ago.  Hey!  I forgot.  He DID win the Conservative leadership, but was denied victory due to last minute fraud in the counting of votes.  But, anyhooooo...I would like to hear what he has to say and particularly, what questions he would ask Scheer and Trudeau.  A man like him, with nothing or little to lose would certainly bring some uncomfortable but delicious "truthiness" to the debate forum.

Speaking about uncomfortable truthiness...the Canadian political scene is still shaking from the bomb blast yesterday resulting from the release of the Ethics Commissioners' report on the SNC Lavalin corruption scandal.  This report unequivocally found Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau "guilty" of unethical conduct in his attempts to lobby for the mega corporation SNC Lavalin against the legal decisions of his own Attorney General.  Now, beginning with his non-apologetic response to the report yesterday, we have Trudeau attempting to foist his corrupt and ignorant interpretation of ((((justice))) onto our legal institutions as a stinking precedent...if he can get away with it. 

But wait.  In reading from Andrew Coyne's editorial in today's National Post  I do spy with my little eye a glimmer of hope...right in the last paragraph.  Please read this snippet and I will have final comments to follow:

.....At times, the “options” they [former Supreme Court Judge Beverly McLaughlin, the PMO and lawyers for SNC Lavalin] discussed bordered on the surreal. Serious consideration was apparently given to having the attorney general intervene in the judicial review — in which her own prosecutorial service was already a participant.

Even stranger were the attempts, apparently unsuccessful, to involve the retired chief justice of the Supreme Court — and Iacobucci’s former colleague — Beverley McLachlin. At one point SNC-Lavalin floated a plan whereby the government would ask McLachlin to mediate a settlement between the company and the DPP, as if the DPP were just another wing of the prime minister’s office.

More often her name was invoked as someone who could provide external advice to the presumably ill-informed AG and her equally hapless team of top legal advisers. The possibility was always carefully put to Wilson-Raybould as involving “someone like” McLachlin. As Dion writes, “she did not know until I mentioned it to her … that preliminary discussions between the former chief justice and SNC-Lavalin’s legal counsel and a senior advisor in the Prime Minister’s Office had already taken place.”

All of this cries out for further inquiry, not least because even the ethics commissioner, despite his best efforts, found himself repeatedly stonewalled by the prime minister’s office. It took 49 days to deliver the first batch of documents he requested; 108 days to deliver the second. The prime minister and his officials suffered a number of convenient memory lapses.

And: “nine witnesses informed our office that they had information they believed to be relevant, but that could not be disclosed.” Why? Because of cabinet confidence — the same cabinet confidence that was supposedly waived in February. So, starting in March, the ethics commissioner raised the matter with both the prime minister and his deputy, the Clerk of the Privy Council, asking that the witnesses be allowed to testify, with a promise that the information they provided would not be disclosed publicly.

His request was denied.

Conflict of interest, frankly, is the least of the concerns raised by this affair. There is a strong whiff, rather, of abuse of power and, possibly, obstruction of justice."

Greencrow says:  Yesterday the RCMP released a statement that they were "carefully" considering the Commissioner's Report [with a view to laying charges?]. Perhaps the Prime Minister denying access to the Ethics Commissioner to evidence of his own activities in the relentless attempts to pressure the Attorney General [attempted corruption] to change the decision of the DPP...might yet lead to a charge of "obstruction of justice"?

Should this be the all the more important could it become to have another candidate like Maxime Bernier fill the empty podium space...left by the disgraced (((former))) Prime Minister Justin Trudeau!

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

UPDATED: Ethics Commissioner - Justin Trudeau "Broke Conflict of Interest Act"

UPDATED: August 14, 2019 New development:  According to the CBC, The RCMP has used new terminology when responding to questions about the SNC Lavalin Judicial Interference Scandal.

The RCMP says it's reviewing the facts of the SNC-Lavalin affair "carefully" in the wake of a new damning report from the ethics commissioner that found Prime Minister Justin Trudeau violated the Conflict of Interest Act, following renewed calls from the Opposition to investigate.

"The RCMP is examining this matter carefully with all available information and will take appropriate actions as required," spokesperson Chantal Payette said in a statement to CBC News Wednesday.

"It would be inappropriate for us to provide anymore comments on this matter at this time."..."

Greencrow comments: It might be left up to the RCMP to "pull the trigger" on behalf of the "mortally wounded" Liberal Party.  I'm sure they have their factotums in the RCMP bureaucracy.

Earlier today: - Well, I just watched the press conference with Trudeau in Niagara-on-the-Lake where he attempted to deflect the latest apparition of this exposé of his extreme stupidity/lack of judgment/understanding of the justice system/venality/stubbornness/whatever and it was truly a display for the ages. He said he "accepted full responsibility" for the conclusions of the Commissioner but then said he disagreed with the most important of those conclusions...that he should not have interfered with the decisions of the Attorney General and/or Director of Prosecutions. He kept ignorantly prattling away about "jobs" as if "jobs" and justice conflate of them is absolutely equal to and can be interchanged with the other. Like, if you "don't have jobs...then how on earth can you possibly have justice?" Such utter bullshit that he expects Canadians to fall for. How stupid does he think we are? stupid as him...obviously.

Andrew Scheer has stopped calling for le Dauphin's resignation, of course.  Why should he allow the Liberals off the hook?  There used to be "rainmakers" and "bagmen" in the Liberal party who would, as I type, be maneuvering to force Trudeau to resign.  Where have all these gone?  South?...just like our sovereignty?!  It appears there's no entities powerful enough to save the Liberal party from Justin Trudeau.

No.  He's going to have this report thrown in his face for the entire campaign...throughout all the debates [watch him try to get out of the debates].  The fact that he did not apologize to Jody Wilson-Raybould and her fellow ousted MP colleague Jane Philpott is just more shit smeared on the walls of the psycho cell that Canadian federal politics has turned into....on the road towards harmonization with USrael/the North American Union.  Jody's going to have a field-day with this report in HER re-election campaign as an "Independent" candidate. Fellow Canadians...if Trudeau is re-elected...our system of justice will be totally destroyed.  Like, we'll have top prisoners "suicided" in their cells prior to trials...that's where all this is headed.

Justin Trudeau Stupidly Thought
he had the right to interfere
in the "SNC Lavalin" Legal Case

If this goes down like I think it should, Justin will resign by nightfall.  Of course I said that months ago when this scandal first broke.  I followed it for weeks and months...expecting that it was a fatal blow to his leadership.  But no.  He surfed the waves and rode out the storm.

Now it appears that a tsunami was building--in the form of the Ethics Commissoner's Report--which was released today.  Apparently le Dauphin broke every ethical rule in the book according to the Commissoner's report.  From the CTV

OTTAWA—Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion has found Prime Minister Justin Trudeau broke the federal Conflict of Interest Act in relation to the SNC-Lavalin scandal, by seeking to influence Jody Wilson-Raybould in "many ways."...
"...The Prime Minister, directly and through his senior officials, used various means to exert influence over Ms. Wilson Raybould. The authority of the Prime Minister and his office was used to circumvent, undermine and ultimately attempt to discredit the decision of the Director of Public Prosecutions as well as the authority of Ms. Wilson Raybould as the Crown's chief law officer," said Dion.
"...This is the second time the ethics commissioner’s office has found the prime minister has broken federal ethics laws. Trudeau was also found to have broken the federal ethics act when he vacationed at the Aga Khan's private island. In 2017 Dion’s predecessor Mary Dawson found that when Trudeau took a Christmas 2016 trip with family and friends to the island in the Bahamas, he contravened the act in four ways related to accepting accommodations from someone registered to lobby his office.'
Greencrow says:  Okay...I will redouble my "cri de coeur" and say the guy needs to go, toute suite.  What is he guilty of?  Well, mostly gross congenital stupidity.  Like I said years ago about him...he unfortunately inherited his mother's looks--and brains.  He just didn't understand the most basic principle of justice...that to work it needs to be separate from political interference.  He didn't/doesn't understand that justice must not just prevail...IT MUST APPEAR TO PREVAIL.  Otherwise, it loses respect in the eyes of the public and nobody can use it...not even the rich.

This is a lesson they lost years ago down in USrael.  Trudeau is so stupid that he thinks that American frontier "justice" [as exemplified most recently in the murder/disappearance of prisoner Jeffrey Epstein] already applies here.  No, silly boy, you still had a few hoops to jump and a few judges/commissioners to corrupt before you got your "American justice".

We have some very interesting minutes, hours and days ahead.  Oh Canada!!!

LOL MSNBC is already showing "Trudeau's Life in Pictures"  What kind of an omen is that?

Tuesday, August 13, 2019

Public Broadcasters in the West are the Biggest Liars of them All

Jack Nagler - CBC Ombudsman

So, as I predicted in one of my recent series of posts on the Epstein "suicide"...the MZM would bury the matter within 48 hours under a sodden, heavy "Official Story" blanket.  Anyone who subsequently tries to remove the blanket will be dismissed as a "conspiracy theorist".  Witness this headline from the Canadian Ziofascist mouthpiece "National Post".

Colby Cosh: Jeffrey Epstein was no Lee Harvey Oswald, but try telling that to America's conspiracy theorists

PBS, plus BBC and CBC all liars for organized crime

The dissidentvoice blog had a recent post about how the taxpayer-funded public broadcasters, like PBS, BBC and CBC, have become "keepers of the official state myths".  To this I would add that the public broadcasters in the West are also the keepers and main purveyors of the official Ziofascist myths [one and the same???].  This has become extreme since the Western "Five Eyes" nations-- all former sovereign nations--fell under occupation by the Ziofascist, globalist criminal cabal following the 9/11 MosCIAd coup.

I have wanted to write to the CBC head office literally for years to complain about this.  Ever since I was kicked off the CBC comments forums ["banned permanently"] as I've been told whenever I try to login.  Ironically [or not] I was banned shortly after Justin Trudeau became the prime minister of Canada back in 2015.  Le dauphin's henchwoman, the Nazi-supporting Chrystia Freeland who's grandfather was the Nazi editor of a propaganda newspaper in WWII Ukraine, took a particular interest in and mis-used her newfound power to do a purge of the CBC forums, kicking off any commenters who were troublesome in nature, i.e., who frequently espoused "over truthiness" on the forums in a vain attempt to waken the sheeple.

The excuse they used for banning me was that I often linked my blog to my CBC comments.  They accused me of attempting to "monetize" my comments.  Well, as anyone with half a brain cell blog is not monetized, never has been and never will be.  But the CBC is adept at believing their own lies.

So [in my dreams] I would like to write to the CBC ombudsman and complain about the pervasive pro-Israel bias of the CBC...i.e., never taking the Palestinian POV; constantly deifying the "White Helmets".  The "White Helmets" like ISIS itself, are Israeli proxies in the Middle East.  Everyone knows that--but the CBC.

I would also like to complain to the CBC ombudsman about the editorial bias in the CBC towards international supporting the Neo-nazi junta in Ukraine and actively fomenting political instability in Venezuela by promoting the ouster of the legitimate, democratically elected leader, Maduro and installing the Western puppet, 'Random' Guaido.  According to a recent post in, the reason Canada [and the CBC] is supporting this illegal and immoral aggression towards the nation of Venezuela is so, once the puppet Guaido is installed, Canada can join in the looting and destruction of the nation and its resources.

The numb nutz puppet leader of Canada does not realize that when precedents, like the aggression against Venezuela are supported by militarily vulnerable/resource rich nations like Canada, it is a form of suicide.  We're signing our own death warrants.  But that's the long goal of the Ziofascist moles inserted into all Canadian institutions, including the CBC--the eventual destruction of the vestiges of Canadian sovereignty.

So dear readers, I would dearly love to write to the Ombudsman of the CBC and complain once again about my "permanent banning" from the CBC comments forums.  I would also mention the pervasive pro-Zionist reporting bias in the taxpayer funded CBC. Unfortunately, looking at the photo above of the current Ombudsman...what kind of response do you think I will get?  Res Ipsa Loquitur....the thing speaks for itself.

Is it not my Canadian right to object to Ziofascist bias in the public broadcaster?  Do you not think that having an Ombudsman who is a member of that prevailing bias is a grotesque conflict of interest?

Monday, August 12, 2019

"They Switched Him Out" -- and other American Judicial Perversions

Nomadiceveryman video re latest
on the Epstein "Travesty of Justice"

No autopsy report and no cause of death.

Well, the Epstein "Travesty of Justice" is winding down now.  As predicted by almost everyone in the alternate media, there will be no true investigation/justice in this "tangential titillation" as greencrow called it from the beginning.  It's sad to be right sometimes.  It's sad that there is not one prominent voice in USrael courageously speaking out in support of their justice system.  But no.  Down the swirly it goes.

In the video analysis above, Nomadiceveryman Scott Creighton provides the details of how the justice system has been co-opted, corrupted, and laughed at by the mossad operatives in NYC.  Scott talks about the autopsy that has no definitive results and about the "Peeps" of Epstein, who appointed a known liar pathologist to sit in on the "autopsy".

Scott has arrived at the conclusion...that's what happens nowadays...we all have to arrive at our own conclusions in the dearth of a functional justice system...and decided that Epstein was "switched out" with a conveniently similar looking dead body and that he was whisked away to parts unknown.  Fromthetrenchesworldreport also reported this theory yesterday, as a result of a mysterious message showing up on 4chan.  Here's the message:

"...The ominous message posted to 4Chan at 8:44 a.m. reads:

Not saying anything after this pls do not try to dox me but last night after 0415 they took him [Epstein] [to] medical in a wheelchair front cuffed but not 1 triage nurse says they spoke to him. Next thing we know trip vans show up? We do not do releases on weekends unless a judge orders it. Next thing we know, he’s put in a single man cell and hangs himself? Here’s the thing, the trip van did NOT sign in and we did not record the plate number and a guy with a green dress military outfit was in the back of the van according to the tower guy that let him through the gate. You guys I am shaking right now but I think they switched him out."

Well, the above cryptic message...literally a cry from the judicial as close to the truth as humanity is ever going to get on this matter.  Meanwhile, the MZM is closing ranks in support of the "official story".  Here is some drool from the mossad-controlled CBC:

"Epstein autopsy completed but more information needed, medical examiner says

Greencrow interjects:  More information?  Nawwww.  more time to allow the cattle/sheeple to forget the facts of the matter.  Facts like Epstein was supposedly under a "suicide watch".  Here's the response to that inconvenient fact:


"Jail may have been understaffed

Guards on Epstein's unit were working extreme overtime shifts to make up for staffing shortages when he died, a person familiar with the jail's operations tells The Associated Press.

The person familiar with the Metropolitan Correctional Center's operations told The Associated Press on Sunday that one guard in Epstein's unit was working a fifth straight day of overtime and another guard was working mandatory overtime. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because he lacked authorization to discuss jail operations publicly.

The jail staff failed to follow protocols leading up to Epstein's death, according to a report from The New York Times, deepening the need for a probe into what led to the highly connected financier's apparent suicide.

Epstein should have been checked on by guards in his cell every 30 minutes, but that didn't happen the night before his apparent suicide, a law enforcement official told the Times."

Nomadiceveryman reveals a particularly disgusting element of the case in the above video.  Disgusting, yet this element turns up in almost every situation that involves the moCIAad/CSIS in North America.  This is the element where the criminals get to profit from their crime--at the expense of the taxpayer.
...Looks to me like Epstein's peeps are gonna be allowed to sue the federal government for this one. How's that for a nifty plot twist?..."

Greencrow concludes.  I've wallowed in this fetid outhouse pit for long enough, folks. This outhouse needs to be's getting full...gag!   Hopefully this is the last post on this topic on this blog...unless something outrageous [how can anything be more outrageous than the daylight robbery of the justice system?] occurs.

I'm going to submit my conclusion as to what went down.  Up until the 4Chan and the non-autopsy I was leaning to believing that Epstein was killed by M16 or the MosCIAd or one of the other mob elements that occupy USrael and are holding it in a death grip.  NOW I agree with nomadiceveryman and others.  Epstein was "switched"...just as described in the 4chan message.  He was switched for a body of a dead man, similar in appearance.  Hey, if they can switch John F. Kennedy's body, they can certainly switch Epstein's.

Over and out of this outhouse.