Tuesday, May 12, 2020

Companion to: A Solution They Do Not Want You To Know?

Dangerous replicators could easily be too tough,
 small and rapidly spreading to stop

Readers, this is a Nanobot 101 article I gleaned from the Internet.   It was published by Express.co.uk back in July of 2017.  It supports what Tarrel, the interviewee in Dana Ashlie's video I posted earlier today, had to say about Nanobots.  Folks, this could very well be the horrific threat that the perpZ are making to the world's leaderless leaders.  This could be the threat that is causing them all to behave like hostages, give billions of dollars to the extortionists, and generally commit economic suicide on behalf of their respective countries.  This is the only potential calamity catastrophic enough to warrant their reaction over the past few weeks.

The extortion, IMO, goes like this:  "You give billions of dollars to our Big Pharma vaccine corporations--or we will "activate" the nanobots that are already installed in the citizens of your countries--causing many of them to come down with a strange and deadly "virus". You make sure all the citizens of your countries get vaccinated ["within 18 months"] with our mandatory vaccines that will further extend our nanobot control, or we will cause a second, worse, wave of the deadly virus by activating even more of our nanobot armies."

Or, some variation of the above.  Please read the following and I will have further comments to follow:

"Self-replicating Nanobots could DESTROY all life on Earth, warn experts

SELF-REPLICATING tiny robots could completely consume all life on Earth and lead to the end of the planet, experts have warned.

By Published July 7, 2017

Self-replicating Nanobots could DESTROY
 all life on Earth, warn experts

Nanobots, which are theoretical tiny robots a single nanometre wide – one billionth of a metre – are currently being worked on and in the future may dominate the planet if they get out of control.

They can be used for several purposes but boffins hope to use them mainly for in-body procedures, such as replacing cells in the body for fighting things such as cancer.

Such would be the technology that the nanobots would be able to act as if they are cells and self-replicate, most likely through protein folding, where they can split and create another version of themselves. Louis A Del Monte, physicist and author of the book Nanoweapons, wrote in an article for the Huffington Post: “You can think of them as the technological equivalent of bacteria and viruses.”

The minuscule bots are expected to arrive in the 2050s, according to Dr Del Monte, following the rise of artificial intelligence, which will help to create the revolutionary bots.

While experts are developing nanobots for the good, there are fear this could quickly get out of control.

Eric Drexler, an engineer who is considered one of the pioneers of nanotechnology, warned in his book Engines of Creation way back in 1986: “Imagine such a replicator floating in a bottle of chemicals, making copies of itself…the first replicator assembles a copy in one thousand seconds, the two replicators then build two more in the next thousand seconds, the four build another four, and the eight build another eight.

“At the end of 10 hours, there are not thirty-six new replicators, but over 68 billion.

“In less than a day, they would weigh a ton; in less than two days, they would outweigh the Earth; in another four hours, they would exceed the mass of the Sun and all the planets combined — if the bottle of chemicals hadn't run dry long before.”

He goes on to warn that they could begin destroying and replacing all biological life on Earth – leading to the end of humanity in what is known as “The Grey Goo Scenario”.
Mr Drexler: “Early assembler-based replicators could beat the most advanced modern organisms. 'Plants' with 'leaves' no more efficient than today's solar cells could out-compete real plants, crowding the biosphere with an inedible foliage.

“Tough, omnivorous 'bacteria' could out-compete real bacteria: they could spread like blowing pollen, replicate swiftly, and reduce the biosphere to dust in a matter of days.

“Dangerous replicators could easily be too tough, small, and rapidly spreading to stop — at least if we made no preparation.

“We have trouble enough controlling viruses and fruit flies.”

Chris Phoenix, Director of Research of the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (CRN) however says that there are other things to worry about with nanotechnology.

He wrote in a paper titled Safe Exponential Manufacturing along with Mr Drexler, who has tried to distance himself from the grey goo scenario – a term he coined: “Runaway replication would only be the product of a deliberate and difficult engineering process, not an accident.

“Far more serious, however, is the possibility that a large-scale and convenient manufacturing capacity could be used to make powerful non-replicating weapons in unprecedented quantity, leading to an arms race or war.

Policy investigation into the effects of molecular nanotechnology should consider deliberate abuse as a primary concern, and runaway replication as a more distant issue.”

"Nanobots could be used to invade the body 
and fight cancer, for example." Or, OTOH,
They could invade the body and attack the heart
 OR THE LUNGS for example, as Tarrel 
reported in my previous post

Greencrow concludes:  At the very least, our politicians should answer a few simple questions about nanobot technology and how far it has progressed relative to this article written in 2017.

Why are all the leaders of all the nations in the world acting so cowed, so terrified, so in "lockstep" to appease whatever it is that is threatening humanity?!  Humanity has a right to know about the extent of this acknowledged [nanobot technology] potential threat to our planet.


FreakedOut said...

Very interesting info on the nanobots GC! Scary stuff!
It would be really nice to know how to totally defeat any nanobots. Is the mineral Boron the only thing?

Northerntruthseeker said...

Hi Crow... As we discussed yesterday, they are on the cusp of full AI nanobots... And the original assumptions that they were going to use these devices for good is of course misleading considering how evil they are and how the sickos in charge actually hate mankind....

I agree with you in the concept that these bastards will indeed use these devices to medically cripple victims instead of using them to medically heal people.

I will talk to you soon... This sinusitis attack has given me a fever and really is miserable... I am trying my best to post articles, but it has been hard to read and concentrate with my nasal passages flaring up!

greencrow said...

Hi North:

Hope you feel better soon. I think with this nanobot thing we might just be getting a bit closer to the REAL Covid-19 agenda.

Anonymous said...

Hi GC. Scott from Chicago. I'm not too familiar with nanobots. I'm sure they exist. Two things come to mind. First, What is their power source? Being machines, they must have power. Being microscopic...very small power source. How long does it last? Second, how to self-replicate? What material do they use? I'm sure the technology exists, but questions remain. I'm not quite ready to go all in on the latest booga-booga...be afraid, be very afraid. Knowledge is power. We need more knowledge, and answers. Keep up the great work.

FreakedOut said...

Hi Scott from Chicago,
Remember, the human body is bioELECTRIC and maybe what's powering the nanobots. I have a popular book from a research doctor called "The Body Electric", the authors name is Robert O. Becker MD and it's available on Amazon. I haven't read it from cover to cover yet but I'm planning to read more of it to help possibly connect some dots.

Anonymous said...

Hi GC. Hello FreakedOut. It's Scott. I've read that book. I'm aware we are not what we think we are. We are a self contained electro-chemical carbon based entities. Self-contained. We reject intrusion. Immune system to fight intruders. So...these nano-thingees mask themselves from our immune system? And also derive their power from our own electrical generation? That's a bit too far to me. Far too Sci-Fi. Yes. I will listen to and research any information. But I think of the people behind the stuff. Americans? Doubt it. Remember...this is a bit 50s B-movie scary stuff. So this nano stuff overcomes our immune system, then does its evil...then reproduces...somehow...using material we can't identify? does it use magic? You can't create something out of nothing. So a mechanical thing uses what? Organic material to reproduce? Sorry. I need a bit more than scary scary. Me? I suspect misdirection. Be scared of the nanobots while we loot the Treasury. Remember, the magician ALWAYS wants you to watch one thing...the trick is done elsewhere. Just thinking out loud. I could easily be wrong.

greencrow said...

Hi Anonymous:

I believe the nanobots use human protein as fuel. Is that correct, FreakedOut?

The reason I posted about nanobots is because for over 200 countries to fall victim to a massive extortion/scam and to give the extortionists billions of dollars during a telethon...the threat must be huge and it must be grave. At first thought it must be the threat of an EMP attack but after I listened to Dana Ashlie's video I thought that might just be the threat the extortionists are using. Reason being that the nanobots could be deliberately misconstrued as another "wave" of the Covid-19 virus pandemic.

greencrow said...

Something else has occurred to me while I have been attempting to reverse engineer this scam back to its source. I believe the countries and the provinces/states of those countries are being somehow "incentivized" to prolong the lock-down for as long as possible. On the surface and according to logic...they SHOULD be opening up their economies because: a) the hospitals are empty and the longer this goes on the more people will get wind of the ridiculousness of it all; and because the Covid-numbers are going down. BUT there seems to be some force pushing back against opening up the economies. Perhaps the longer the politicians hold out the more money they get from some source. This is a BIG mystery to me.

FreakedOut said...

Hi GC and Scott,
Not sure about using human protein as fuel? Terral said Morgellons is silicon based cancer? Uncontrolled replication of the silicon. Silicon....as in used in electronic devices like diodes/transistors...etc Semiconductors. Think electricity.

Lots of questions Scott and it is very unreal! As i said "other worldly".
Right now I'm starting to read the book "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg MD. According to records, during the Maunder Minimum(1645-1715,)which is minimal solar activity, there where NO flu pandemics around the world!What's that,like 70 years?
It seems like we are going through another solar minimum now.But now we have too much man made EMF's causing us to get sick.I just read that absorbing too much electricity without being able to discharge it causes Flu like illness.

greencrow said...

Hi FreakedOut

Here's a good precise on Nanobots:


Looks like they might run on....wait for it....sugar! Or, perhaps you can glean more out of the scientific mumbo jumbo than I can.

greencrow said...

Here's a couple of cautionary paragraphs from the above link:

Recent studies have specified that some nanomaterials can be found in air, water, soil, and consequently in human and animal bodies; thus, these nanomaterials have caused some public debate on their toxicological, health, and environmental effects [3–7,12,13]. The experts point out that risks of nanomaterial toxicity can increase through the fabrication, transportation, handling, usage, waste disposal, and recycling of nanomaterials [2]. Even though some progress has been made in the field of toxicity and safe handling of nanomaterials, a lot of new research efforts are needed to standardize how these nanomaterials can affect human life in the long term and how they can be handled properly without concerns during their manufacturing, transportation, storage, and consumption.
It has recently been reported that some nanomaterials with different surface areas, sizes, shapes, surface charges, and energies can interact with cells, tissues, body parts, or organs, and can damage or kill those organs and cells, block blood flow, and also result in a number of serious diseases or permanent organ failures. The diseases related to some of the nanomaterials include bronchitis, asthma, liver and lung cancer, Crohn`s disease, Alzheimers, Parkinsons, heart disease, and colon cancer. As a result of nanomaterial exposures, environmental and public health concerns arisen in many industrialized countries [13]. If the mechanisms of nanomaterial effects on human health and environment are studied and understood, those deadly diseases associated with nanomaterials can be substantially eliminated. A number of nanoparticles and their protection methods have been developed and safely used worldwide, but it is always advisable to manufacture nontoxic nanomaterials and devices for costumers. In these studies, nanomaterials in general and nanofibers/nanowires in particular are analyzed and the recent developments in the field are reported. Fig. 10.2 shows the different products incorporated with nanomaterials, mainly in consumer products [2,14].

Anonymous said...

Hi GC and FreakedOut. It's Scott. So in the article Dr. Del Monte says this technology will be available in the 2050s. 30+ years from now. I think we have time to get a handle on this. Sugar as a fuel? Hmmm...maybe. I keep thinking these are microscopic things we're talking about. First they have to overcome our immune system, then seek out a fuel source, then replicate using what? our own bodies? What replicates their brain? Control center? It sounds a little too Sci-Fi. I keep thinking all this from people who faked moon landings, pandemics and who knows what else. Lots of money will be poured in research. Many corporations will have a great bottom line...but results? A tiny thingee that evades our immune system which is designed to kill intruders...then this microbot finds fuel and building material inside us to replicate itself...using silicon? How about carbon? and the microbot, with its tiny control center can do all this including building countless more control centers? OK...I will listen to information on anything. But again, Del Monte says 2050s...who knows what world will exist then. I'm 60. So whatever the wotld becomes...I won't see it.

Anonymous said...

Hi GC and FreakedOut. It's Scott again. Yes I can be a pain sometimes. I reread the article and saw it's all theoretical right now. They may be able to replicate using "protein folding"? OK. I guess. What is the delivery mechanism? How will the Masters of ALL keep from being dosed? Again, my mind tries to look at something and ask questions. I don't watch TV so it can tell me how to think. I ask questions and seek answers. Those answers cause more questions. Yep. I can be a pain. Or as my ex-wife would say...a Royal Pest who is born skeptic. Sorry for all my posts. You triggered my thinking hat.

greencrow said...

Anonymous said:

"...Dr. Del Monte says this technology will be available in the 2050s. 30+ years from now. I think we have time to get a handle on this..."

Just so's you know the "Deep State covert science" is always about 20 years ahead of what they're telling us. Listen to the video again to what Terral says about the nanobots. He's very specific about how they multiply and what their energy source(s) are.