Saturday, August 31, 2019

Via Rail Terror Patsies Ordered New Trial - "... grounds on which the new trial was ordered are 'exceedingly technical'."

The Ontario Court of Appeal has ordered a new trial
 for Raed Jaser left, and Chiheb Esseghaier.
 The men were found guilty on terror-related
 charges in connection with a plot to
 derail a passenger train

Good morning everyone.  A few days ago I promised to post the second in a series I call the Dog Dayz of Summer News.  These are news stories that are deliberately dropped into the Newz Cycle when most alternative news groupies and/or people who are otherwise geopolitically awake are on holidays.  At least that is the hope of the news managers...the people who decide what we will be allowed to read or see on TV.

Today I am posting a story that the perps would like to see buried on the back pages during the halcion days of late August...when everyone is busy returning to their normal life after summer vacay.  The reason they want this story buried is because it has a stinking resemblance to other stories in a similar vein.  Unknown people, mostly swarthy male darkies [people of middle eastern muslim extraction] arrested, tried and convicted for "terror crimes". Then, for some unknown or known reason, the legal case falls apart and they are either freed or a new trial is ordered.

We had a case here in Vancouver that I've beaten to death.  The Terror Patsies of 2013.  A young couple who were former addicts and who were/are mentally vulnerable and dirt poor...were set up to bomb the Victoria Legislature on Canada Day 2013.  Regular readers will by now be very familiar with the details....particularly the details about how CSIS and the RCMP set the couple up and in the blunt words of the trial judge "manufactured [the] crime".  John Nuttall and Amanda Korody were set free and today live in parts unknown...probably financially subsidized by a large, secret [taxpayer funded] settlement.

Well, the case below is quite similar.  Please read the details I snipped from two reports and I will have final thoughts to follow:


From the BBC

Train terror plot convictions set aside by Canadian court

Raed Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier were arrested by Canadian authorities in April 2013.

They were found guilty in 2015 on charges including conspiracy to commit murder for the benefit of a terrorist group.

Those convictions have now been aside due to an "error" by the trial judge.

On Tuesday, an Ontario appellate court judge issued a ruling directing a fresh trial for the pair, arguing that the jury in the trial had been improperly selected.

Jaser, 41, a Palestinian from Toronto, and Esseghaier, 36, a Tunisian from Montreal, appealed against their conviction and sentencing in February.

They cited a number of errors including the rejection of a request they had made regarding jury selection.

The two were arrested following a joint surveillance operation by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and FBI agents from the US.

They were alleged to have spent months plotting to kill as many people as possible on the VIA rail passenger train route.

US officials said at the time that the attack would have targeted a rail line between New York and Toronto, a route that travels along the Hudson Valley and enters Canada near Niagara Falls.

VIA Rail operates passenger rail services across Canada and carries nearly four million passengers annually.

During the original trial the prosecution alleged that Jaser and Esseghaier had been motivated by Islamist extremism and they were both sentenced to life in prison without chance of parole until 2023.


and from CTV and CBC we have two more reports on this case:

2 men jailed on Via Rail terror charges get new trial because of jury-selection mistake

TORONTO -- Two men found guilty of terrorism charges in connection with a plot to derail a passenger train between Canada and the U.S. were granted a new trial Tuesday after Ontario's highest court found the jury that convicted them was improperly selected.

Raed Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier were found guilty in 2015 on a total of eight terror-related charges between them. They were sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole until 2023.

The two challenged their convictions, and lawyers for Jaser argued the trial judge mistakenly rejected their client's request regarding the method of jury selection. The lawyer appointed to assist Esseghaier -- who continues to be self-represented -- agreed in written arguments that a new trial had to be ordered on that ground..."

"...Jaser and Esseghaier were arrested in April 2013 after a months-long investigation that involved an undercover FBI agent who gained their trust and secretly recorded hours of their conversations.
The two were recorded speaking about terror plots they would carry out in retaliation for Canada's military actions in Muslim countries, including the planned derailment of a Via Rail train travelling between New York and Toronto..."


And finally a snippet from an op-ed where Rosie DiManno glosses over or simply doesn't see /understand the most salient details of the case and berates the courts for overturning the verdict.

Rosie DiManno: Appeal court decision in Via Rail terror trial brings entire court system into disrepute

….And voila. As per the Appeals, Jaser was denied the jury selection option to which he was entitled by law. Everything subsequent was tainted — the jury, the trial, the verdict, the sentence. And further, even though Esseghaier was not party to the appeal application, the jury selection stank for him too, so he also deserves a new trial.

Yeah, something sure as hell stinks.

Footnote: This was the very same case bruited about by the federal Liberals to show that terrorist plotting can be effectively interdicted by law enforcement and prosecuted successfully in Canada’s open courts."


Greencrow says:.  The most salient point about the above case is that it was fostered and enabled from the beginning by "law enforcement".  These two men could not have done what they supposedly did without the aid and abetment of the FBI.  Just like Nuttall/Korody they were terror patsies who's vulnerabilities were being exploited by the very individuals who, in our society, are entrusted with their protection.  Yes, folks, it appears to be yet another "Travesty of Justice".  That's what the so-called "security agencies" churn out these days...instead of going after the drug dealers in the Western World opioid epidemic.

But, dont'cha know that, according to what Paul Craig Roberts said in one of his posts, the US legislature passed a law awarding a bonus to the agencies who "catch" terrorists.  It's a real money-maker.  We still don't know whether the Canadian parliament passed a similar law...but I would not doubt it for a moment...knowing the relentless efforts being made to "harmonize" the two countries' legal and legislative systems.

Another "tell" in this story...that these two men were set up by "law enforcement" to be terror the gap in the story where the reporterz should have told what the other reasons for the new trial are.  The reporterz restricted themselves to the "official story" that it was an error in "jury selection" that led to the verdict being set aside.

I say bullshit to that.  I say that the real reason this verdict is being set aside is that finally they've decided to clamp down on the "manufactured crime", particularly after the Nuttall/Korody "Travesty of Justice".  The lawyers for the two men likely threatened to go public with the "other reasons", so the PTB decided to pre-empt them by setting the convictions aside,...the "other reasons" forever obscured and buried under a cobweb of legal technicalities.

The conviction--and these victims [of security agency corruption] will now, just like Nuttall/Korody, sink beneath the waves of the public radar.  Raed Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier will likely take their tidy secret financial [taxpayer funded] settlements and disappear forever into the ether world of pervasive institutional government corruption.

Yet another "Travesty of Justice" gone poof!

Thursday, August 29, 2019

"TERFS go home, Kill Terfs"

"TERFS Go Home" Graffiti scrawled on Windows
of Vancouver Women's Rape Shelter

TERF (/ˈtɜːrf/, also written terf) is an acronym for "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". Coined in 2008, the term is applied to a minority of radical feminists who espouse sentiments that other feminists consider transphobic, such as opposition to transgender rights, the exclusion of trans women in women's spaces, and the rejection of the assertion that trans women are women.

Yesterday, I promised to post another in a series I call the "Dog Dayz of Summer Newz" but this item was on the supper TV news last night and I chose it instead.  This item is about some anti-feminist graffiti that was recently scrawled by vandals on the front windows of the Vancouver Woman's Rape Shelter.  There have been other defilements such as dead rats nailed to the door as well.

It was always going to come to this...because, IMO, Transgenders hate real biological women and are fundamentally jealous of them on a primal level.  In other words, Transgenders want real women to go away...and be supplanted by them..."SUPER women".  Transgenders put real women to shame. They know how to apply make-up better than real women.  They dress more femininely and they are Waaaaaay more hypersexualized than real women.  Real women look dowdy by comparison and live extremely booorrrrrring lives as well.  Real women are drudges...burdened as they are by child-bearing/rearing AND earning the family [woman's] wage.  The vast majority have no time to apply fake eyelashes in the morning and simper around in wigs and low-cut dresses all day.

Transgenders "out perform" real biological women on every single level...earning capacity, femininity/looks, physical strength, sports athleticism, political savvy.  Yes, every single category...except the category of needing social support when they're raped, abused [and often murdered] along with their biologically "normal" men.  Only real, biological women need a special place where they can go and feel safe from that minority of  sexually "normal" males... who have developed a very abnormal predatory and abusive nature towards women and their children.

Needing such a space sets them apart from their "trans" wannabes.  And that irks the trans. They want to go to these places as well, to pretend they're women. And, most importantly, have their new identity confirmed by acceptance of them by real women.  Trans do get into toxic relationships and they do want shelters.  Blocked from going to the Women's shelters, they've taken to harassing, shaming and terrorizing the women who run these places and the women who go there.  Their need to stamp their desperation to BE women onto society...trumps real, biological women's need for safety.

Society has become entirely manipulated by these LGTQ... and soon MAP's [Minor Attracted Persons]...who have slowly carved out a legally sanctioned niche in the "Identity Politics" pantheon of social misfits.  Society is now nearing a state where it is helpless and forbidden to tell them simply to fuck off.  To tell the  Trans to leave the women alone. To assert that real biological women have the right to safety and they have the right to maintain a "real women only" social safety network.  Think about this folks, the primary right that biological women have that gives us power is the right to unite in solidarity...and now this right is being men!

The "Trans" can start up their own shelters but something tells me they won't.  Because the harassment is not about wanting and needing a safe shelter...they can band together and set one up if they're so inclined.  It's about bullying real women out of their comfort zone and it's an extremely deviant form of misogyny.  They hate real women so much...due to their own screwed-up and frustrated sexuality...that their only sexual outlet is to mock, parody, compete with/dominate the object of their jealous hatred...and force them into compliance.  When thwarted in this activity, their real hatred comes out in aggression like the vandalism and harassment above.  Most women are subliminally aware of this mockery, parody, competitiveness...and hatred.... and that's why we don't want them around when we're trying to heal.

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

UK going to "Dog[z]" During Dog Dayz of Summer - Parliament to be Prorogued before BREXIT deadline???

Leader of the Official Opposition Jeremy Corbyn.
There's a Government Conspiracy to prevent him
from being elected to the office of Prime Minister

I have a couple of posts that I refer to as the "Dog Dayz of Summer Newz.  These are horrific stories that should be plastered all over the front pages of all the newzpapers in the world but, instead, purposely occur during the "Good Olde Summertime" when the "living is easy"...when everyone is supposedly on holidays and nobody is supposedly paying attention.  They try to slip these horrors through and then pretend that its a done deal and "nothing can be changed.  This is one of them.

The Speaker, who does not traditionally comment on political announcements, continued: "However it is dressed up, it is blindingly obvious that the purpose of [suspending Parliament] now would be to stop [MPs] debating Brexit and performing its duty in shaping a course for the country."

England has become the ginnea pig for the new style of government that is going to ultimately be foisted on the "Five Eyes" Klepto-Terroraucracies.  Please read the following snippet from RT and I will have more comments to follow:

‘An outrage and threat to our democracy’: Corbyn slams Johnson’s parliament suspension pre-Brexit 

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said he was “appalled” at Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s request to Britain’s queen for a suspension of parliament in the weeks leading up to the UK’s EU withdrawal.

“If Johnson has confidence in his plans he should put them to the people in a general election or a public vote,” Corbyn said, following Wednesday’s flurry of Brexit developments. The opposition leader added that Johnson was attempting to “avoid scrutiny” of his Brexit plan

Corbyn was expected to call for an emergency debate in parliament next week to pave the way for opposition MPs to introduce legislation to prevent a no-deal Brexit, but Johnson’s proroguing request outmaneuvered him.

For his part, Johnson denies claims that he was wilfully circumventing parliamentary protocol with the request to suspend parliament, though many opposition MPs claim the move is tantamount to staging a coup..."


and this from the BBC
Parliament to be suspended in September

Parliament will be suspended just days after MPs return to work in September - and only a few weeks before the Brexit deadline. -

Boris Johnson said a Queen's Speech would take place after the suspension, on 14 October, to outline his "very exciting agenda".

But it means the time MPs have to pass laws to stop a no-deal Brexit on 31 October would be cut.

House of Commons Speaker John Bercow said it was a "constitutional outrage".

The Speaker, who does not traditionally comment on political announcements, continued: "However it is dressed up, it is blindingly obvious that the purpose of [suspending Parliament] now would be to stop [MPs] debating Brexit and performing its duty in shaping a course for the country."

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "Suspending Parliament is not acceptable, it is not on. What the prime minister is doing is a smash and grab on our democracy to force through a no deal," he said.

He said when MPs return to the Commons next Tuesday, "the first thing we'll do is attempt legislation to prevent what [the PM] is doing", followed by a vote of no confidence "at some point".

Three Conservative members of the Queen's Privy Council took the request to suspend Parliament to the monarch's Scottish residence in Balmoral on Wednesday morning on behalf of the prime minister.

It has now been approved, allowing the government to suspend Parliament no earlier than Monday 9 September and no later than Thursday 12 September, until Monday 14 October..."

"...But with Parliament set to be suspended, opponents have only a few days next week to push for their changes.

Senior Tory backbencher and former attorney general Dominic Grieve said the move by Mr Johnson could lead to a vote of no confidence - something opposition parties have left on the table as another option to stop no deal.

"There is plenty of time to do that if necessary [and] I will certainly vote to bring down a Conservative government that persists in a course of action which is so unconstitutional," he said.

Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said MPs must come together to stop the plan next week, or "today will go down in history as a dark one indeed for UK democracy".


Greencrow says:  The past three or more years in the British Parliament have been all about an effort to deny/subvert democracy.  Ultimately, what the Five Eyes Klepto-Terrorcrats are trying to do is prevent establishment "outsider" Jeremy Corbyn from coming to power and prevent their ongoing effort to destroy the "Mother of all Parliaments"  As the British Parliament is known throughout the English speaking world.

How well I remember the Meech Lake Accord hysterical assault on the Canadian Constitutional Democracy back in the 1980's and early 90's.  Throughout that effort by the Conservative Party to force the ROC [Rest of Canada] to accept the Province of Quebec as a "distinct society"...there was rabid fearmongering to the effect "the worst kinds of things are going to happen in Canada if we don't have this constitutional amendment."  What happened when it was finally defeated?  Exactly nothing...[just like what's going to happen in England--Brexit or no Brexit].  Canada went on...probably a bit stronger and wiser than before. I know I learned a valuable lesson through the experience.

This was similar to what is now going on in the UK.  A band of degenerates is trying to force something through the parliament and onto the UK destroy the parliamentary process and the constitution.  The most logical thing is to call another general election and allow the people to choose--as is normal in a democracy.  But no Calling an election is the very LAST thing the Five Eyes Terrorcrats want to do.

They know if they call an election they'll all be booted out of office and Jeremy Corbyn will become the new prime minister.  So instead they're twisting the parliamentary system into a pretzel and crapping all over it--rather than simply call an election.

An UN-ELECTED Prime Minister, Boris Johnson is going to, instead, prorogue Parliament and give the members only dayz to debate....prior to the October 31st deadline for BREXIT.  What a frigging mess!

Tomorrow...yet another "Dog Dayz of Summer newstory….

Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Johnson & Johnson found guilty of "nuisance", fined million$ over opioid crisis in Oklahoma

Some Johnson & Johnson Products

It would be interesting to know what's REALLY going on behind this sudden pillorying of the mega Corporation Johnson & Johnson.  Oh.  It's not that they haven't been guilty of forcing dangerous products on a gullible and unsuspecting public for decades...they have.  It's just that why now and why single out Johnson & Johnson when MERCK and many other Big Pharma corporations have also been doing the same, or worse?

Johnson & Johnson mustn't have been Ki$$ing the right @$$es, is all I can say.  I remember 20 years or so ago there were rumours about the baby powder.  For years, ads told teenaged girls that they had to sprinkle baby powder on their nether regions right after a bath or they could be "fresh".  Then they said that there was something in the powder that caused ovarian cancer.  Then they said there was asbestos in the baby powder and that Johnson & Johnson had known about it forever.

But this is something altogether new and far more insidious.  Apparently, Johnson & Johnson has been whipping up a global market for their deadly fentanyl's/opioids--deliberately targeting young people--luring them to sudden, unexpected deaths on their mama's basement couches.

Now, belatedly, some of the governments tasked with the odious business of dealing with the dead bodies of young people in alleyways, cheap apartments and, yes, found by their mothers on the basement couch...have begun to fight back.  Please read the following snippet from the "encrypted" BBC and I will have more comments to follow:

Johnson & Johnson, one of the world's largest drug manufacturers, has gone on trial in a multi-billion dollar lawsuit by the US state of Oklahoma.

Prosecutors accuse the firm of deceptively marketing painkillers and downplaying addiction risks, fuelling a so-called "opioid epidemic".

Johnson & Johnson denies wrongdoing and says it marketed products responsibly.

It is the first of 2,000 cases brought by state, local and tribal governments against pharmaceutical firms in the US.

On average, 130 Americans die from an opioid overdose every day, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In 2017, of the 70,200 people who died from an overdose, 68% involved a prescription or illegal opioid...


The latest legal case is the latest in a string against painkiller manufacturers over prescription drugs.

Earlier this month, Teva Pharmaceuticals agreed to an $85m (£67m) settlement with Oklahoma over a similar lawsuit which claimed its opioids had contributed to the deaths of thousands of people.

Purdue Pharma also reached a $270m settlement with Oklahoma in a separate case. The wealthy Sackler family, which owns the firm, has been charged with fraudulently transferring money from the company to protect its funds from litigation.


Greencrow says:  Well, just last week, Johnson & Johnson was found guilty in Oklahoma and fined millions of dollars.  The case is under appeal.  Could this be the beginning of the reigning-in of the (mostly Jewish owned) pharmaceutical companies who've also been preying on the gullible and unsuspecting public with opioids and other killer products--like vaccines?

Or, is this just a sop to the growing awareness of the institutional evil role that these mass predators play in the systemic "culling" of the goyim cattle?  Hey, they still haven't gone after Big Pharma [MERCK] for Gardasil...which the company is still injecting teen girls with.

They still haven't officially admitted that the autism epidemic that has devastated millions of young in the West over the past four or five decades was/is caused by the massive doses of mercury-tainted MMR vaccines that they start giving babies within days of their birth and for a decade or more afterwards.  Canadian provincial governments pay "silence money" of around $20,000 to the parents of autistic children for programs and services intended to ameliorate the injuries done by these vaccines.  But the social and human health devastation caused by the vaccine industry continues unabated and unreported except for heroes like community activist lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is currently suing Merck regarding Gardasil.

Folks, Big Pharma has been preying on humanity for almost a century now and they're not going to stop soon.  They make a Shi!load of money off it...and they control the future of humanity with it.  I compare what's happened to Johnson & Johnson in the Oklahoma guilty verdict as the equivalent of a meat truck throwing a few steaks off the distract the chasing dogs.

Monday, August 26, 2019

Guest Post: Bob Plecas: We don't need Trudeau's apology, we need his resignation

Trudeau caught jogging
on Twitter at the G7

Well, it is seemingly back to normal with Justin Trudeau. He's surfed another political wave...and rode out another corruption scandal storm.  The MZM has already dropped the SNC Lavalin Trudeau II report and moved on to other le Dauphin being caught jogging through the streets of Biarritz, France while attending the G7.  How picturesque...waaaay more his style.

Luckily for the sanity of Canadians, however, a British Columbian like former Deputy Minister of the Legislature Bob Plecas still remembers.  He's written an excellent op-ed that appeared yesterday in the Vancouver Sun.  Please read and I will have more comments to follow:

Guest Post by BC former Deputy Minister, Bob Plecas:

Bob Plecas: We don't need Trudeau's apology, we need his resignation

It may be the smartest political move of this century. If you are a federal Liberal, you should recommend beatification for the person behind Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s refusal to apologize for his actions in SNC-Lavalin.
When the ethics commissioner’s announcement became public, Trudeau argued that he accepted the report but did not agree and would not apologize. That sparked a debate over whether he should apologize, pre-empting and setting aside the real issue.
Apologies are easy, common and routine. Resignations, though? Rare, exciting and serious affairs. Kudos to the back-room hack who decided that we should talk about an apology and not a resignation.
The debate then becomes a question of process and distracts from the damning findings of the report. Pundits are lining up in the opinion pages and on talk shows to debate the finer points of precedent and quibble over definitions. All of which is easily ignored by Canadians engaged in the delightful pursuits of summer. After all, Trudeau has apologized many times before.
Rather than talk about the gravity of findings such as: “The authority of the PM and his office was used to circumvent, undermine and ultimately attempt to discredit the decision of the director of public prosecutions as well as the authority of Ms. Wilson-Raybould as the Crown’s chief law officer,” the national conversation is about whether Trudeau should say sorry.
That’s a much friendlier conversation for him. He set the agenda by framing the question to debate. In politics, the person who controls the agenda wins. A win here is to convince Quebec and break even on the SNC-Lavalin file in the rest of Canada.
But you cannot phone a judge and interfere if you are an MP. You cannot instruct your attorney general to change her opinion on a matter that will go before the courts. You can’t meddle in the legal process for any reason.
Saying it was for a good cause is irrelevant. Arguments that you had a good reason do not absolve your guilt and responsibility in either our legal or parliamentary systems.
Trudeau is the senior official responsible for upholding our legal system. He not only is in charge, he makes the rules. He must follow them. I do not think there is one Canadian who would not recognize that except, it seems, the prime minister.
Let’s talk instead about the report and what should follow from it.
The real result of this damning report is that Trudeau should resign. In our democracy, interference with the judicial process should result in resignation.
I expect a member of his cabinet who violated this principle would resign or be fired. Does not the same hold for the prime minister?
There is precedent. In 1989, then B.C. conflict commissioner Ted Hughes found the premier guilty of a conflict of interest. Bill Vander Zalm did the honourable thing. He resigned.
If Vander Zalm could see what was honourable, why can’t Trudeau? Is all honour now absent from politics? Do politicians sworn to uphold our laws ignore them for special interests in their own constituency and get away with it?
Never mind this is the third time the prime minister has violated parliamentary ethics all MPs thrive under.
Is he going to wait until the people fire him? Is that what it will take for him to do the right and proper thing?
We don’t need Trudeau’s apology. We need him to be an honourable member of parliament and resign.
Bob Plecas was a deputy minister under five B.C. premiers that crossed the political spectrum.

Greencrow says:  Bob Plecas, like the greencrow, is old enough to remember when a scandal like the SNC Lavalin fiasco meant an automatic resignation of the politician responsible.  It was the "honourable" thing to do.  Nobody questioned it.  The guilty party immediately resigned and disappeared from view.  That was the end of the political career of him or her.

That resignation allows for the body politic to recover from the assault on its legitimacy and viability.  In a democracy, where the people are supposed to be in charge...a scandal...particularly a corruption like a physical assault on the political institution itself.  The corruption is like a knife to the chest.  If the victim [the Democracy] survives at all it's because the knife of corruption is surgically removed [the guilty party resigns]...the wound stitched...and the patient allowed to recover.

In today's government by the Deep State in the Five Eyes Terror-aucracies...the corrupt politician never resigns.  Why not?  Because s/he rightfully believes s/he owes his/her position only to the Deep State and the Deep State is thrilled by the corruption.  THEY would never demand a resignation...quite the opposite...they will even fraud the election to maintain the corrupt puppet in power for another term.

So now Canada is like a victim staggering around with a knife sticking out of its chest.  The MZM is working overtime saying and pretending that the knife isn't there and there isn't blood streaming down the political corpus.  The body politic is dazed and confused by the media distraction and doesn't even know it has a knife sticking out of its chest.  But, if the knife isn't removed by resignation and the wound allowed to heal...then the wound will fester, the infection will spread and the democracy will die.

Canada's body politic is already staggering around with so many knives of corruption sticking out of it from the Trudeau II years, that it resembles a pin cushion.  But, barring a miracle, the corrupt le Dauphin WILL be re-(s)elected next autumn.

Saturday, August 24, 2019

BC First Nations want emergency declared as Salmon Run fraction of what was expected

Sockeye Salmon

I have been writing for years about the world wide fishery crisis.  All over the world, fish are being harvested to extinction by huge commercial trawlers....their breeding grounds destroyed in the process.  I have called for a 10 year world wide moratorium on commercial fishing.

Under my proposal, fish would only be caught by locals in coastal villages for local consumption. Commercial harvesting of fish would be limited to land based fish farms.  Humanity needs to be weaned off fish.  This is sad because fish consumption is an excellent source of protein and other nutrients.  But humanity has been incredibly stupid and greedy regarding fish...never once thinking that some day...and folks it's coming will all be gone.

Don't believe me?  Read the following report from global news.  Department of Fisheries and Oceans was expecting this Fall's sockeye salmon run to be around 4,000,000.  Well, now they're hoping for 380,000 and even that is optimistic. Here is a snippet from the news report:

Federal fisheries experts are painting a devastating picture of the challenges facing Pacific salmon and point to climate change as the main culprit.

Fisheries Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said that 2019 has been an especially difficult year in what has been a decades-long decline in stocks, after his department released a new report on the state of wild Pacific salmon..."
Yes, the "experts" [the same entities that got us into this mess] are saying that the decline is caused by "climate change".  Overfishing has nothing whatsoever to do with it, nor does the massive pollution of our the point where there's sludge bigger than the size of Texas swirling around in the Pacific...and no nation or global leader is doing anything about it...too busy warmongering all over the world...and fighting wars for Israel, dontcha know.

Regular readers will already know my position on "climate change".  Unless and until the global powers fess up about the weather and climate manipulation they're secretly conducting all over the world, chemtrails, bioengineering, EMP, HAARP and the like...there will never be an honest discussion about what is going on with our weather and what to do about it.

Today, they're lying and remaining silent about weather geoengineering/climate sabotage...which they call "climate change". This is the catch phrase they're all wringing their hands about--which they say is the cause of...fires in the Brazil Amazon rainforest this year [the Brazilian president accused "NGO"s of setting the fires]; fires last year in California [many of which also appeared to be deliberately set]. We'll never know who's fu*king with our weather and what the long term effect on the environment will be.  So, enough about so-called "climate change".

Back to the fish and where they're going.  We need to stop the trawler commercial fishery like they did in Newfoundland with the cod fishery in the 1970's and 1980's...cold turkey.  It was devastating for the Newfoundlanders, but they adjusted and now the small communities have fishers who can go out and haul enough cod for the locals and for the restaurants to serve the tourists.  Just a meagre reminder of the huge schools of codfish that were so great off the Atlantic Grand Banks at the time of first contact between Europeans and the First Nations that they would press against the sides of the sailing ships, threatening to capsize them.  Now all that is gone. [BTW, I will never forget the shock of learning that the US NAVY tested depleted uranium torpedoes, firing them underwater in the cod spawning grounds of the Grand Banks, where they remain to this day on the ocean floor, piled up and rusting AND then my even greater shock and anger to learn they did the same thing here in the salmon harvesting areas off the coast of Vancouver Island.  That's when I understood the true meaning of mass insanity.] 

Did the Canadians and the Newfoundlanders blame the nebulous and smoke and mirrored "climate change" for the death of the cod fishery?  No.  They weren't quite as devious back then.  They fessed up and blamed it on its actual cause...overfishing!

So now the coastal ocean in the Pacific North West is barren.  My husband and I dropped a line a couple of times during our summer sailing cruise a few weeks ago and with the exception of one tiny salmon....which we threw back...the ocean appeared completely empty.  We saw a few small fishing boats out as well but nobody was catching anything.   

So stop blaming "climate change" when the huge fishing trawlers are still out there...wending their way between the islands of floating plastic.  "Man up" and call a moratorium on the world wide commercial harvesting of fish.  Allow the oceans to recover.

Call a climate conference if you will...and force all the lying climate perverts to tell us what they're doing to our planet.  These climate perverts are just as hidden from the population as the sex perverts and pedophiles that run the planet...probably they're one and the same.  We need to act for the planet before it's too late...if it isn't already.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

Pompeo in Ottawa to discuss Huawei Legal Fiasco - ie, "Get Their Stories Straight"?

NOTICE TO READERS- Although I have several posts waiting on the tarmac to take off [be published] I am deliberately delaying and leaving this one up due to the MZM burying this important story under a pile of garbage/fake news like the Latt Father blabbering away about Canada taking in his Jihadi son.  Your patience and help in spreading THIS story is appreciated.

FBI Badge - Should every RCMP
officer be issued one?

Yesterday Canadians were so distracted by the "Sorry, (Not Sorry)" Trudeau II SNC Lavalin scandal that many missed another pot boiling over on the stove.  The Huawei affair.  Perhaps this was intended because the potential fallout from the Huawei matter far outweighs the potential fallout of the Ethics Commissioners "guilty" verdict in the SNC Lavalin matter.  As I posted yesterday, the defense team of Huawei CEO Meng Wanzhou dumped a load of very incriminating documents into the public realm as a prelude to a hearing in this matter that is coming up in September.  The hearing is to request even more documents that provide evidence of the corruption and collusion that went down by the Canadian Border Security Agency, the RCMP and the FBI on the night Meng was arrested back in late 2018.

Low and behold, within hours of these incriminating documents being dumped on the media, Pompeo arranges a snap meeting in Ottawa with le Dauphin and his handler, Chrystia Freeland.  That meeting is going on as I type and is reported by the CBC in the snippet below.  Please read and my comments will follow:


The U.S. government is working "diligently" to help release the two Canadian men detained in China, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Thursday while on a visit to Ottawa.

Pompeo, a high-profile member of the Trump administration, is meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland.

Before heading into closed-door meetings, both countries made it clear China would dominate the conversation..."


Greencrow notes: So, according to the CBC, the trio of Trudeau, Pompeo and Freeland are working "diligently" to help release the two spies that were caught with their pants down in China after Meng's arrest and who were arrested in a tit for tat by Beijing to show Ottawa that it was playing with the big boys.  IMO, what is really going on is the trio is desperately trying to come up with a response to the devastating information contained in the Huawei Extradition Case data dump.  Below is a report from the Vancouver Sun which outlines the information disclosed publicly by Meng's defense lawyers.  Please read and I will have final comments to follow:


Huawei executive’s defence team alleges Canadians acted as 'agents' of FBI

Notes provided in court show the RCMP asked the FBI if the U.S. was interested in Meng’s luggage and that a Canada Border Services Agency officer wrote down Meng’s passcodes
The defence team for a Chinese telecom executive is alleging Canadian officials acted as “agents” of American law enforcement while she was detained at Vancouver airport for three hours before her arrest.
In court documents, defence lawyers for Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou point to handwritten notes by Canadian officers indicating Meng’s electronics were collected in anticipation of a request from the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States.

The notes show the RCMP asked the FBI if the U.S. was interested in Meng’s luggage and that a Canada Border Services Agency officer wrote down Meng’s passcodes, while another questioned her about Huawei’s alleged business in Iran.

This happened before she was informed of her arrest, the defence says. “The RCMP and/or CBSA were acting as agents of the FBI for the purpose of obtaining and preserving evidence,” alleges a memorandum of fact and law filed by the defence.

“The question that remains is to what extent and how the FBI were involved in this scheme.”

The materials collected by the defence were released before an eight-day hearing scheduled for September, in which the defence is expected to argue for access to more documentation in advance of Meng’s extradition trial. The Attorney General of Canada has yet to file a response and none of the allegations have been tested in court.

Meng’s arrest at Vancouver airport has sparked a diplomatic crisis between Canada and China and drawn international scrutiny of Canadian extradition laws. She was arrested at the behest of the U.S., which is seeking her extradition on fraud charges for alleged violations of U.S. sanctions against Iran.

Both Meng and Huawei have denied any wrongdoing. Meng is free on bail and is living in one of her multimillion-dollar homes in Vancouver.

The RCMP and CBSA did not respond to requests for comment on the documents, but have said in a response to a civil claim that border officials only examined Meng and her luggage for immigration and customs purposes. Meng’s extradition trial won’t begin until Jan. 20, but the court documents shed light on her defence team’s planned arguments that her arrest was unlawful and for the benefit of the U.S.

“These are allegations of a purposeful violation of a court order and the abuse of important Canadian legal norms for improper purposes, namely, to further the objectives of the requesting state,” the defence says.

They plan to argue that the U.S. committed an abuse of process by using the extradition proceedings for political and economic gain. Parts of the defence are comments by U.S. President Donald Trump that he would intervene in Meng’s case “if necessary.”

The seizure of electronics and questioning of Meng by border officials in Canada also follows a pattern of how Huawei employees have been treated at U.S. ports of entry. “This targeting has included the apparent abuse of customs and immigration powers to search and question Huawei employees at various U.S. ports of entry,” the documents say.

The defence accuses officers of intentionally poor note keeping that obscures what exactly happened, including why the arrest plan apparently changed.

The documents suggest that Canadian officials initially planned to arrest Meng “immediately” after she landed, by boarding the plane before she got off. Instead, three CBSA officers immediately detained Meng when she disembarked while two RCMP officers stood nearby and watched, despite their knowledge of the warrant calling for her “immediate” arrest, the defence says.

The defence argues spotty notes kept by the CBSA officers constitute a “strategic omission.” “When assessed together, a clear pattern emerges from these materials: the CBSA and the RCMP have strategically drafted these documents to subvert the applicant’s ability to learn the truth regarding her detention,” the defence says.


Greencrow says:  So, what the Meng Defense team now want the court to grant is disclosure to them of the substance of telephone calls and e-mails that were exchanged between Canada and US officials regarding the unlawful detention of Meng Wanzhou the night of her arrest.  There are some mysterious gaps in the information thus far provided to them.

What HAS already been provided to them, IMHO, is enough to cause any uncorrupted Canadian judge to order a stay of proceedings and immediately release Meng Wanzhou at the hearing in a couple of weeks.  Meng's Charter Rights were clearly breeched when she was held at the Vancouver airport for three hours while her devices were searched.  All this took place under the noses of two RCMP cops who had clutched in their sweaty little hands the arrest warrant...which should have been executed immediately--so Meng could be advised of her rights.

Just another in a horrific series of arrogant, ignorant, scofflaw decisions by le Dauphin.  IMO, he had to have been involved to allow the RCMP cops to break the law that night...otherwise...why would they have done so?  Were FBI officers also at the airport rummaging through Meng's luggage and devices?  If so, this is a horrific breach of her Charter rights AND Canadian sovereignty.  Re the missing evidence...possibly there were three-way phone calls going on between Pompeo, Trudeau and Freeland the night of Meng's arrest...and then phone calls to the RCMP/CBSA/FBI at the airport to activate the plan.  If these phone calls/e-mails are disclosed to the defense...…well, let me just say that the Trudeau II Ethics Commissioner Report will, by comparison, look like a parking ticket.