Saturday, November 17, 2018

CIA has moved its lips....Ipso facto we are now assured that MBS IS INNOCENT of Khashoggi False Flag Murder

Western Media Full of Photos of Prince Salman
looking "very guilty"

The CIA-controlled Main$tream Media has been full of headlines over the past 48 hours convicting [without a trial, of course] Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of the murder by proxy of CIA asset Jamal Khashoggi.  What the headlines have revealed, as if we didn't already know, more than anything else...is how powerful the CIA plants and moles are within each and every major newz outlet in the West.  They chorus as in unison...they even use the same incriminating photos...they jerk as in kneejerk, they prostrate themselves as in slave...they roll over and put all four paws in the air as in dogs.

First, here is the supplicant headline from yesterday's CBC [Canadian Bullshit and Crap]:

 CIA concludes Saudi prince ordered Khashoggi killing: officials

Greencrow says:  RT, on the other hand, tongue in cheek, is ridiculing the toadying Western press by mimicking their headlines but adding "quotes" around the phrase "with high confidence".  This is a "tell" that they don't believe the assertion of Salman's guilt for a moment.  They're using the very same phrase that the UK used when convicting, also without trial, Russia of perpetrating the Salisbury poisonings of the double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter last March, 2018.  Please read the RT version, dripping with sarcasm, and I will have final comments to follow:


"CIA ‘concludes with high confidence’ Saudi Crown Prince ordered Khashoggi murder – Washington Post 

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman personally ordered the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Turkey last month, the CIA has concluded, according to anonymous sources who spoke with the Washington Post and Reuters. 

The US foreign espionage agency assessed with “high confidence” that the prince was behind the death of the Post columnist, the newspaper reported on Friday evening, citing “people familiar with the matter.” Reuters later cited its own source as saying that the spy agency “had briefed other parts of the US government on its assessment,” which contradicts the official position maintained by both Riyadh and Washington thus far.

Saudi Arabia initially denied that Khashoggi had been killed inside the kingdom’s consulate in Istanbul, where he was last seen on October 2. Eventually, however, Riyadh admitted the journalist had died on the premises, blaming it on a “fight” with officials sent to take him home. Khashoggi was living in self-imposed exile in Turkey, having become an outspoken critic of the crown prince.

Writing in the Post last month, Turkish president Recep Erdogan claimed that the order to have the dissident journalist killed “came from the highest levels of the Saudi government,” not naming the crown prince but seemingly implicating him.

Among the evidence examined by the CIA was an alleged phone call between Khashoggi and the Saudi ambassador to Washington, Khalid bin Salman –the crown prince’s brother– who assured the journalist it was safe to go to the consulate, the Post reported.

Ambassador bin Salman abruptly left Washington on October 11, and was not expected to return, according to reports by multiple media outlets, which were neither confirmed nor denied by Riyadh.

The CIA’s “purported assessments are false,” Fatimah Baeshen, a spokeswoman for the Saudi embassy in Washington, told the Post. “We have and continue to hear various theories without seeing the primary basis for these speculations.”

Later in the evening, Ambassador bin Salman tweeted that the Post failed to print the embassy’s full response, including the statement that he “has never had any phone conversations” with Khashoggi.

“This is a serious accusation and should not be left to anonymous sources,” the ambassador said


It is unclear to what extent the reported CIA assessment was based on evidence rather than assumptions, such as that the crown prince is the “de facto ruler” of Saudi Arabia.

“The accepted position is that there is no way this happened without him being aware or involved,” the Post quotes an anonymous US official, described as familiar with the CIA’s conclusions.

Among the evidence reportedly obtained by the CIA is the audio recording from a listening device Turkey had placed inside the Saudi consulate, the Post reported. CIA Director Gina Haspel was allegedly given a copy of the audio, said to have been shared with officials from other countries as well."

**************

Greencrow says: If the CIA says it. It's a lie. If the CIA wants it...it's because the Deep State wants it. If the CIA wants Saudi Crown Prince Salman gone, it's not because he's killed someone...it's because he's transgressed the Military/Industrial Complex/Global Ziofasist Banksters. How did he do this? It's self evident. He ordered some S-400 anti-missile military equipment from Russia. Everyone knows what happens when you go down the street to another grocer when the grocer up the street is protected by the mob. And anyone with half a brain will now know conclusively that the CIA is the official security force of the USrael Gangster Deep State....with all the history of high crime, mass murders and treason that implies. They will also logically conclude that the CIA "owns and operates" ALL the Western Main$tream Media and uses these newz outlets in the perpetration of endless crimes, False Flags, False Flag hoaxes, assassinations, pretexts for military aggression, etc., etc. Logic also dictates that the CIA's "affiliates" in other Western countries, such as the MI6/MI5 in UK and CSIS in Canada are also deeply involved with this International Network of Global Gangsters and Thugs.

It only remains to be seen if the Mob gets their man...whether Salman will be turfed from his leadership position in SA. It has worked over and over in the past, Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Kennedy, Wellstone, Saddam, Gadhafi etc., etc., BUT...but...but it didn't work with Erdogan and it didn't work with Assad. So...there's hope for Salman yet. Stay tuned.

5 comments:

wallflower said...

Given the nature of MBS and the barbarity of his death squads beheading, crucifying and countless hideous death sentences in SA...given the inner fighting in the Knesset...given the inner fighting in the US govt...given the "betrayal mentality" that all of these live day to day with...given........................
Well, you get the picture. Can we hope that they will all kill one another so we can get on with Life already? A house divided against itself will fall...and that includes so called allies.
Also I couldn't help highlight wapo in my mind as an israeli firster and onlyster which gives a clear picture without words!

greencrow said...

Hi Wallflower:

"...I couldn't help highlight wapo in my mind as an israeli firster and onlyster…"


Yes, another clue as to who dun it. Wapo is owned by the guy who did the software pkg for the CIA.

Reading between the lines said...

As much as I detest the CIA and all it's associated criminals in arms , I still have a feeling that MBS is guilty .Just go back and get acquainted with what happened to Saddam Hussein .A friend of the US administration until..... well until he no longer was useful .MBS was probably setup by the same CIA and associates. The more things change the more they remain the same .Same MO different timeline IMHO.

greencrow said...

Yes, RBTL...MBS's actual guilt or innocence is immaterial. He may have been told by his CIA handlers to off the patsy Khashoggi...and dutifully did so. Just like Saddam was encouraged by the US Ambassador to attack Kuwait...and dutifully did so...only to unwittingly provide USrael with a casus belli for the first Iraq War.

My point is that this is another CIA false flag to get rid of Salman--because he wants to buy the S-400.

Reading between the lines said...

We are on the same page.The S-400s is probably the motive .