Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Canada's Terror Patsies Trial Update. Assault on Justice in the "Five Eyes"?

Statue of "Justice" outside of the Vancouver, BC Courthouse

There's a big media hullabaloo going on south of the border regarding the death of US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. I'm not too familiar with the man or his jurisprudential record. It seems as though he was a "conservative" justice and perhaps the only conservative on the Supreme Court at the time of his death. There's a lot of controversy in the alternative media surrounding the circumstances of his death at the age of 79. Did he die as reported of a heart attack? Or, was he murdered (speculation swirls that he was offed at a Texas ranch by a known "former Viet Nam US Commander" John Pointexter)--so that Obama can appoint an ideological ally of the democrats.

From reading the seems more likely that Scalia's death is being used as a distraction than anything else. There is so MUCH to distract from at this point in US history. They need to distract from the U.S. presidential campaign which is starting to resemble a bus careening down a hairpin turn mountain road with no brakes. They also need to distract from what's going on in Syria. Obama sounded like a complete looney tune the other day when he again tried to make the Alice in Wonderlandia argument that Putin is showing his "weakness" by Russia's (highly successful) involvement in Syria. Obama's presidency will go down in history as the "Mad Hatter" presidency.

But, leaving that for the moment...what is going on re the US Supreme Court? There's been a very effective campaign for several decades now to neuter the US Supreme court vis a vis protecting the US Constitution. The US Constitution at one time was one of the few bulwarks against the rogue Deep Military/Industrial State taking over the US. To accomplish their now successful covert coup, the perps systematically took over the entire judicial system in the US...from their elected junior court judges and prosecutors...right up to the Supreme Court. The Job is Done. Now there's no way, as an example, that any of the perps of 9/11 will ever face justice in the US. The only justice they have to fear is international justice and, BTW, they have also sewn up the International Court of Justice too...just for good measure.

Having been so successful in corrupting all the institutions of justice in the US...this international gang of crooks, criminals and mass murderers has moved on to what they call the "Five Eyes" network of vassal states...which includes Canada. It hasn't been an easy road in Canada. Our system is based on appointment rather than (fraudulent) election. Some of the Canadian judges have been, horror of all horrors, incorruptible. Even the top Canadian Federal Court judges will sometimes step out of line and can't be bought. But the perps know corruption takes time and they're willing to put in the hours, and years, if necessary.

The Terror Patsies Trial is a landmark event on the road to a corrupt judicial system in Canada.

CSIS has worked very hard right from the conception of the plot and devoted wide-ranging resources and millions of tax-payer dollars in the effort. They expected a few bumps along the road to miscarriage of justice and incarceration of the innocent...but...but...but...somewhere along the line things have gone off the rails (they hope only temporarily). The judge is actually considering the bogus and contrived evidence CSIS is burying her under. Plus: A nosy-parker journalist is reporting on the trial (as copied below) and describing it for what it is...a farce. Granted, the supplicant Vancouver Sun dutifully buried the journalists' report on the back pages, hoping no one would read it. (I finally found it this morning) But here it is. Although there's been no follow-up report since, it's likely that the judge had to adjourn the seven month long trial-upon-a-trial review all the secret evidence about "person X".

Canadian Terror Trial Defendants Nuttall and Korody

I have copied the entire Vancouver Sun report below and will comment further after you have had the opportunity to read this seminal assessment of the trial:

"Ian Mulgrew: Terror plot trial has all the elements of farce.
Closed-door sessions, secret documents, person X and ‘unusual circumstances’

The Canada Day terror plot trial has turned into a 21st-century sequel to Bridge of Spies.Instead of Berlin in 1961, downtown Vancouver’s glass courthouse has become the unlikely setting for a national security drama à la John le Carré.
Rather than a Steven Spielberg and Coen brothers Hollywood blockbuster, however, this appears to be a Star Chamber production written by the heirs of Monty Python.

Justice Catherine Bruce on Monday opened and closed her courtroom, then opened and closed it again as she dealt with legal arguments and secret documents.
During two spells, only she and government lawyers were present behind the shut doors in ex parte hearings.

Her idea of respecting the open court principle was allowing the media to watch her read confidential submissions and classified material provided by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

Justice Bruce has been forced to resort to such opaque procedures supposedly so the nation’s enemies will not learn how CSIS monitored two recovering heroin addicts thought to be Islamic extremists living in a Metro Vancouver basement suite.
“In this case we are dealing with unusual circumstances,” federal lawyer Donnaree Gai Nygard maintained, and the contortions were required to ensure CSIS had “a viable and functioning human source program moving forward.”

It took five-months last year for a jury to find Surrey couple John Nuttall and Amanda Korody guilty of terrorism offences for planting phoney pressure-cooker bombs at the Legislature in advance of July 1, 2013 celebrations.

Justice Bruce has spent the past seven months trying to determine whether they were entrapped and victims of police misconduct. She is painstakingly trying to navigate the shoals of the CSIS and Canada Evidence Acts that contain broad protection for national security operations.
As a result, the country’s much touted open-court principles and common sense seem to have been all but thrown out the window.

The legal complications flow from the defence mounted by Nuttall and Korody — that they were two vulnerable individuals with bizarre beliefs exploited and snared by police in a sophisticated 240-officer sting.
In particular, they suggest a person X who was possibly an asset of the spy agency helped radicalize Nuttall, setting him up for the Mountie takedown. If that is a whacko-Hail-Mary legal strategy, it is beyond me why CSIS and government lawyers didn’t and haven’t provided the court with a succinct denial.
Nuttall was a recent convert to Islam in 2012 and the court has heard that he antagonized local Islamic leaders and attracted Surrey RCMP attention with his incendiary jihadist rhetoric and eccentric behaviour.

Justice Bruce has been stymied in figuring out how he went from being a potentially violent, mental health nuisance to a national security threat because the government wants to protect the spy agency’s relationship, if any, with person X and hide what it was doing in the Metro Vancouver Muslim community in 2012.

Nuttall’s involvement with CSIS is a key to determining whether the RCMP had sufficient legal grounds to target the couple and whether they were manipulated.
Earlier this month, Justice Bruce held other extraordinary closed-door sessions while ordering the service to reveal some material that concerned person X.
But that disclosure raised more questions than it answered. On Monday, CSIS came to court with more material that required the day for Justice Bruce to review.

The sheer volume indicates that person X, if not a CSIS source, did more with the agency than simply call in a CrimeStoppers tip. She said she would rule today whether any of the secret documents were relevant to the trial and should be disclosed to the defence. Even if Justice Bruce decides material should be revealed, CSIS may not release it. The agency can still refuse to disclose the documents by invoking its legal shield under the Canada Evidence Act, which could be pierced only by the Federal Court of Canada.

The trial continues."

Kudos go out to Vancouver Sun journalist Ian Mulgrew for his intrepid effort to report on this case. It must be frustrating for him to find his blockbuster reports relegated to the back pages. It must be mystifying for him, perhaps being unaware of the bigger, globalist picture, to see how CSIS systematically works to pervert justice and deny it to these poor, vulnerable souls...but....

This is how the court system and jurisprudence is corrupted. You convict an innocent person(s) based on false, contrived evidence and keep the "evidence" secret from the public. Then, the case becomes a 'legal precedent" which forms the basis for future miscarriages of justice. Legal Precedents are the building blocks of the justice system. When they are weak or broken...the system is broken.

In furtherance of their globalist agenda...the perps need to "harmonize" the judicial systems of all of the "Five Eyes" countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand). With the farsical Terror Patsies Trial and its hapless defendants now in legal limbo...the international globalist neocon war mongering mass murdering Ziofascist cabal are well on their way to corrupting the judicial system of this vassal "Five Eyes", formerly sovereign, state of Canada.

No comments: