Sunday, October 15, 2017

Never argue about Politics or Religion....or both

9/11 Researcher Christopher Bollyn
embarrasses Jewish questioner
during Q & A

This morning's alternative news blogroll (to the right on this page) contains two "Must see" articles about why you should never get into an argument with a Zionist.  The first is the above video from one of my "favourites".  Interestingly, this link has now disappeared entirely from the blogrolls, which often happens when the link is a bit too "truthy".  Luckily, I did copy the link before that happened.  I recommend all readers view this video in its entirety...because it's only towards the end that the Jewish questioner finally breaks down in frustration at having all the facts thrown at him and admits why the Jews want to control the Middle East and have fomented US wars to do so.

The second is the post about the Las Vegas false flag written by John Kaminski which Northerntruthseeker has printed in its entirety on his blog.  Particularly this statement by Kaminski:

"...The real problem for the Jews is that you can’t argue with them. They are immune to logic, which makes their future very problematical when everybody finds out what they have done to sabotage the health and happiness of everything that lives...."

Watch the video above for visual proof of the above statement by Kaminski.  Bollyn (and the cameraman off camera at the back of the room) try to reason with the Jewish questioner.  They keep running into total absence of logic.  The Questioner seems to have been brainwashed with all the buzz words and talking points of the M$M.  He starts off by lecturing Bollyn with the shopworn "definition" of a conspiracy theorist..."One who starts off with a conclusion and then dismisses anything that contravenes that conclusion to end up with a (conspiracy) theory."  Bollyn counters by asking the Jewish questioner "what facts have I omitted?  Name just one".  The questioner quickly moves away from that argument and does not present one fact.

Rather, he moves on to the ludicrous statement that "Bush started the war on Iraq because Saddam threatened his father".  This is a 5 year old's comic book (Superman and Batman) view of geopolitics.  Bollyn and the off screen cameraman keep drilling down to force the questioner to provide proof or theory to back up his ridiculous the Jews in the WTC didn't get a warning so, out of 400 Jews working in the WTC, only four (according to Netanyahu) were killed in the atrocity.  The cameraman provides video proof that several prominent New York Jews, including former Senator, Al Franken who had offices in the WTC admitted they were warned.

The topic switches to the Middle East and the question of why the United States has been forced to go to war for Israeli interests.  This is where it gets interesting....the offscreen cameraman keeps drilling down on the Jewish questioner's responses....Why is Israel so disliked in the middle east that it has to "defend itself" from all its neighbours?  Finally the truth is presented (by the cameraman):  "Because of what has happened to the Palestinians (and by extrapolation is threatened to all Arabs living on land that Jews covet)."

The questioner, to his credit, finally answers the question of why Israel wants to destroy Syria...He asks:  "Have you ever walked the Golan Heights?  Have you ever stood on top and seen the land spread out before you?  The Golan Heights is prime land for anyone to shoot down at Israel."  So, in other words...any land in the middle east that is within shooting distance of Israel is fair game for Jewish takeover.  Is that logical?????

Bollyn points out that the Golan Heights are fertile and priceless oil fields as well as being geostrategically important.  He also points out that Israel's occupation of those lands has never been accepted by the world community...BUT... that if Syria were destroyed...the lands would, of course, automatically and by default fall into Israeli hands.  So, it is all about the land after all....the debate finally drilled down to the ultimate nugget of truth.

At this point, the debate ended as the questioner and his wife got up and left the room.  The video cuts out but then takes up again as the cameraman briefly re-engaged with the couple in the hallway.  The wife, who had up until then been silent, told the cameraman that she was not going to engage with him anymore because "our people have been killed for this".  Yes, the victim card...the last card to be played in any debate with Jewish ziofascists.  Not the Palestianians who have died and/or been existing for 60 years on the biggest outdoor concentration camp the world has ever seen, not the Iraqis, Syrians, Afghanis, Libyans, Yemenis etc., etc.,...but "our people".

Like Kaminski says:  

".... you can’t argue with them. They are immune to logic..."


james@wpc said...

This is a very serious problem not only for the cultural group on display here (because they will shoot themselves in the foot, again) but for all zealots for the same reason - their lack of logic cuts them off from performing their own reality checks. That is what logic is for - to test reality.
It is a problem for us too, because we are competing with the zealots in trying to persuade the 'general audience'. Specially if we are using logic. It is a problem because most of the 'general audience' cannot recognise logic let alone use it. It's an IQ problem.

greencrow said...

James says:

"....It's an IQ problem...."

Unless you're a psychopath...then it's a manipulation problem....or opportunity.

Reading between the lines said...

You are absolutely correct , there is no sense arguing with dogmatic religious thought as it is always outside the boundaries of logic. Christopher Bollyn has spent much of his life exposing the 9/11 event as terrorist activity on the part of the US neocons along with the Mossad ,all for the sake of the Oded Yinon plan .He is totally correct IMHO.If one does the research , all of the dots connect very well and a clear picture emerges.

greencrow said...

The Jewish religion (sanctified land grab) has made it impossible for the Khazars to remain in the Middle East. Putin has offered them an alternative...return to the Khazarian area in Russia. If they do this...the world may be afforded say, 100 years of peace before they repeat the cycle there.