As the dust continues to settle from last Sunday's 9/11 ground zero collapse of Hillary Clinton, it's starting to look more and more like a Black Swan Event...something unexpected that stands out against the pattern of contrived media "white swan" events. Rather than, as I first thought, yet another rung in the ladder up to the alibi to allow Clinton to bail from a campaign that is going very, very badly for her...and as WikiLeaks' Assange has promised, will get much worse. So, while Hillary no doubt has mental health issues...she also likely has some serious medical issues that unexpectedly cropped up at the memorial service. Probably the timing, rather than the medical situation itself was the "Black Swan."
Why do I suspect it was more likely a Black Swan event? Due to the way the culpable, corrupted Main$tream Media has reacted since. Rather than try to penetrate further into the wall Hillary has built around her dubious health...the M$M has gone into full distraction/defense/hyperbole mode. Hillary herself has led the way by going on CNN Anderson Cooper's show and, instead of coming clean about her health...obfuscated and demanded Trump's Income Tax records.
The media including the CIA asset, Washington Post has, itself, resorted to (planted) ridiculous "conspiracy theories" like Trump and Russia may have "poisoned" Hillary.
"...The Post's suggestion that the President of the Russian Federation could be involved in a plot to poison the Democratic candidate for President of the United States is the ultimate in shoddy journalism. The only "poison" in the current presidential campaign is that being spread by the Clinton campaign and its allies like the Post that wish to turn the new Cold War started by the Obama administration into a Hot War under Clinton. The United States and the world can ill-afford a Clinton presidency that would base its policies on the world stage on kooky conspiracy theories." Wayne Madsen
Most compellingly, Obama himself went on the campaign trail and and into full attack/hyperbole mode--attacking Trump's recent appearance on the Larry King show on RT, in order to deflect attention away from the Hillary mess:
Sooooooooooo.....according to the Obomber sock puppet....being popular with the citizens is a...negative (perhaps even cause for dismissal from office)....and Saddam was popular only because he "controlled the media and had taken away Iraqis civil liberties and jailed dissidents." Refresh my memory...what was the "Patriot Act" if not taking away civil liberties. Who is Chelsea Manning if not a "jailed dissident"?
The US president [Obama] went further, comparing Putin to Saddam Hussein.
“When the interviewer asks him [Trump], ‘why do you support this guy [Putin]?’ He says, ‘He is a strong guy. Look, he’s got an 82 percent poll rating.’ Well, yes, Saddam Hussein had a 90 percent poll rating. If you control the media and you’ve taken away everybody's civil liberties, and you jail dissidents, that's what happens,” Obama told a Hillary Clinton rally in Philadelphia.
Even though the United States has admitted it invaded Iraq on the basis of lies...it is still trying to justify the invasion/destruction of a sovereign nation on the basis of Saddam not being a nice guy...even though....wait for it....he had a 90% poll rating. Ouch! I'm going to get a sick headache if I continue to parse Obama's deep Orwellian doublespeak.
But, unfortunately, it works with American citizens. I keep thinking about one of my favourite 9/11 stories. About five years ago now, I went to a convention for people in the construction industry. My partner worked in construction and that's why I was there. The keynote speaker happened to be head of an engineering firm in New York City. He was touted as an internationally recognized leader in his field. Great! I thought. After his speech I'll buttonhole him about 9/11 and see what he knows. I might get some inside information.
So, I went up to him after his speech and he was more or less alone. I introduced myself and said I was interested in his personal memories and opinions on 9/11. He gave me a blank look. I asked him if he had been living in New York during the event and he said he had. I listed a few of the anomalies in the official story and particularly the WTC7 building that had collapsed later on in the day, not having been hit by a plane. He looked at me with a completely blank look. He knew nothing about WTC7 and nothing about any of the other anomalies. I must have had a very surprised look on my face because the event organizer came over and took the guy away from me by the arm.
It was a real insight into how clueless [in the literal sense of the word] Americans are. And it convinced me ever since to never underestimate how much Americans will accept...even when it defies logic and common sense. And, if you don't see the connection between this post and the previous post about the lack of real leadership in the US....you haven't been paying attention.