Saturday, June 11, 2016

Syrian Update: Confirmation that the US is in an undeclared Civil War

Syrian Aleppo Neighbourhoods 
attacked by al-Jewsra

Many bloggers have faulted Russia for pulling back its forces in Syria before the job was finished and the "foreign-backed terrorists" like ISIL and al Nusra [which I'm now calling al-Jewsra since an ex Mossad chief disclosed that Israel is providing "tactical support" to the terrorist group] were defeated.  I have maintained that Russia has always been a patient warrior and that has been the secret of its success in battle over the centuries.  

One factor that Putin may have considered when making his decision to attempt to "negotiate" an end to the Syrian conflict is the undeclared civil war going on within the US Institutional Bureaucracies...particularly between the Pentagon and the "intelligence agencies", i.e., the CIA.  I maintain that Putin probably wanted the world to have time to absorb the reality of this civil war and for the UN and other organizations like the EU to face the reality that they are not dealing with one government authority in the United States...but at least two and possibility three: The Pentagon, The CIA and the White House.  Briefly put, the CIA is a rogue group that wants perpetual war for Israel and has created, funded and controlled the "terrorists" in Syria, including al Jewsra.  On the other hand, the Pentagon has the military leaders who are tasked with the obligation of converting the bellicose braggadocio, hegemonic CIA war plans of "Seven Countries in Five Years" into reality.  

Why is the US so determined to de-stabilize Syria?




The Pentagon has been unable to fulfill the grandiose neocon, Ziofascist wet dream...due to lack of manpower, will of the people, whathaveyou.  Each side attempts to control the flaccid Obama White House.  Obama, a "reed in the wind" president, if ever there was one...waffles back and forth...frustrating both sides.

This analysis that I found in the "Daily Beast" (a right wing blog) admits and in my opinion correctly summarizes the US internal conflict.  I have pasted the entire article below and have highlighted in red the parts that support my contention that there is a bureaucratic civil war going on in the US (at the very least).

CIA and Pentagon Bicker While Russia Wipes Out U.S.-Backed Rebels
American-armed rebels are in deep trouble in the city of Aleppo. Washington’s response: Escalate the fight—between the U.S. military and intelligence communities.

U.S.-backed opposition forces in Syria’s largest city are facing a ferocious Russian-led assault, raising fears that the rebels could be eliminated in a matter of weeks.
So how are the Pentagon and the intelligence community responding?
By catfighting among themselves.
Two Department of Defense officials told The Daily Beast that they are not eager to support the rebels in the city of Aleppo because they’re seen as being affiliated with al Qaeda in Syria, or Jabhat al Nusra. The CIA, which supports those rebel groups, rejects that claim, saying alliances of convenience in the face of a mounting Russian-led offensive have created marriages of battlefield necessity, not ideology.
“It is a strange thing that DoD hall chatter mimics Russian propaganda,” one U.S. official, who supports the intelligence community position, wryly noted to Pentagon claims that the opposition and Nusra are one in the same.
But even if the rebels were completely separated from Nusra, there would still be something of a strategic conflict with U.S. military goals. The rebels in Aleppo, these Pentagon officials note, are fighting the Bashar al-Assad regime; the American military effort, on the other hand, is primarily about defeating the self-proclaimed Islamic State.
“We have no role in Aleppo. The forces we are supporting… are fighting ISIS,” one defense official explained to The Daily Beast.
The intelligence community, which backed opposition forces in Aleppo, believes ISIS cannot be defeated as long as Assad is in power. The terror group, they say, thrives in unstable territories. And only local forces—like the ones backed by the CIA—can mitigate that threat.
“The status of the opposition is resilient in the face of horrendous attacks by the Syrian and Russian forces,” a U.S. intelligence official explained to The Daily Beast. “The defeat of Assad is a necessary precondition to ultimately defeat [ISIS]. As long as there is a failed leader in Damascus and a failed state in Syria, [ISIS] will have a place to operate from.
“You can’t deal with ISIS if you have a failed state,” the U.S. official observed.
The interagency squabble is a manifestation of growing tension about the U.S. approach to arming rebels, which is inconsistent across Syria.
The Defense Department currently is helping some rebels fighting ISIS in northern and eastern Syria, with more than 250 U.S. military advisers alongside forces marching toward the ISIS capital of Raqqa. This combination of fighters also is attacking the city of Manbij, which has served as a major thoroughfare for ISIS fighters, weapons, and supplies traveling from Turkey to Syria. Meanwhile, the CIA is backing some opposition forces in Aleppo, Syria’s biggest city and the site of a Russian- and Syrian-led air offensiveover the past few weeks.
“The U.S. has two isolated programs that are not mutually supporting each other and are actually sometimes at odds with each other,” said Jennifer Cafarella, a Syria analyst at the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War.
Indeed, U.S. support for a particular group can change from one part of Syria to another. The Pentagon, for example, backs Kurdish forces associated with the YPG, the armed force of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party, in eastern Syria but not the YPG in northern Aleppo. Indeed, the YPG just north of Aleppo has attacked U.S.-backed forces with Russian help.
“We are not a country of agencies that butt up against each other. The White House needs to decide what its approach is toward Assad and the rebel groups. I think they do have a defined policy toward ISIS,” Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, a senior fellow at the Washington, D.C.-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told The Daily Beast.
The division within the Obama administration comes at a critical time for the war in Syria. Aleppo could descend into a months-long siege between opposition and Russian-backed government forces, endangering civilians and potentially creating a new refugee flow. That’s the better-case scenario. At worst for the opponents of the regime, Aleppo could fall under Assad control within weeks, potentially ensuring his survival. And yet the fall of Aleppo offers no guaranteed outcomes for the war. Indeed, it could encourage Assad’s opponents, like Turkey and Saudi Arabia, to increase their support for the opposition fighting on the front lines.
Regardless, Assad’s confidence was on display earlier this week when he addressed parliament and said he would rid Aleppo of its foreign-backed “terrorists,” going so far as to say Aleppo will eventually become Turkey’s “graveyard.”
“Our war against terrorism is continuing,” Assad said in a speech to parliament broadcast by state TV. “As we liberated [Palmyra] and before it many areas, we will liberate every inch of Syria from their hands. Our only option is victory, otherwise Syria will not continue,” Assad reportedly said.
Russia has said the strikes are targeting only terrorist outfits like Nusra, but such claims are increasingly hard to take seriously. Russian strikes have hit numerous hospitals and routes used by the more moderate opposition.
On Wednesday, at least 15 people were killed in two government air strikes in Aleppo, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which monitors civilian deaths. One strike reportedly struck the Bayan hospital, killing at least 10. The observatoryreported that barrel bombs dropped from government helicopters killed at least five others, including two children, in the Aleppo neighborhood of al-Marjeh.
And according to Institute for the Study of War, which maps attacks across Syria, the number of places that have come under Russian attack nationwide over the past five days has tripled—from roughly 10 to 30. Among the tactics Russia has deployed, according to ISW, is to launch a series of attacks along a main opposition supply route thoroughfare, Castello Road.
And yet there is no push with the Obama administration to give more arms to the opposition groups or increase support, and both defense and administration officials concede that crafting a strategy that appeals to all is difficult.
“It’s not clear there is a defined set of policies for helping the opposition where the benefits would outweigh the costs. And that is due to the problem with al Qaeda being such a strong force with the opposition. How do you strengthen the opposition without strengthening al Qaeda?” Gartenstein-Ross said.
To be sure, the U.S.-led coalition does not have the authority to go after the Syrian regime and its push to break the will of opposition. The U.S. military mission only authorizes strikes that target ISIS. Practically speaking, there are challenges, as well. The U.S. and Russia currently de-conflict to avoid disasters during their air campaign. That gives Russia something of a say in where U.S. strikes happen, and Assad’s backers are unlikely to make strikes against government forces targeting opposition forces easier.
Perhaps that’s why the U.S.-led coalition has not conducted any strikes around Aleppo in weeks, according to Pentagon statistics.
Whatever the outcome in Aleppo, critics argue the lack of a clear approach toward rebels weakens the U.S. ability to help resolve the five-year civil war.
“The most likely outcome in the near term is that these groups coalesce around hardline elements that are more effective,” Cafarella said

Conclusion:

It must be very challenging for Putin to be fighting the US on two fronts.  He needs to use totally different tactics when dealing with the powers that control the Pentagon, the CIA and the flaccid White House occupant.  The fact that Russia has made such impressive headway in Syria in such a relatively short time....under such complicated conditions speaks of Putin's genius....and the contrasting solidarity within the Russian bureaucracy.

The other point to ponder is how does this civil war factor into the current presidential campaign in the US?  I will focus on this question in a later post.  I will once again repeat President Lincoln's warning about a "House divided against itself".  This is an untenable and unstable situation and could explode above the public radar at any time.....perhaps with a preemptive attack by one faction or another...like an assassination.  The only good news is that there IS an opposition to the neocons. There IS a group that is opposing perpetual war....dismantling of the US Constitution and laws....and all the other evils of the rogue deep state government that took over the US in the CIA/Mossad coup of 9/11.  I know what side I'm on.

4 comments:

ricck lineheart said...

Al Qaeda , Al Nusra , ISIL , ISIS , DAESH ....Did I leave anyone out ? mmm Taliban in Afghanistan ... Almost 16 years and more than 1.5 TRILLION$ later and nothing to show but fewer friends globally and dead Americans . Akin to the American 'War on Drugs' , the show must go on .

greencrow said...

And it appears that most Americans are still totally unaware of what hit them. Then comes along another False Flag like the Orlando shooting and it's a totally new ballgame...they are genetically incapable to connecting dots.

Northerntruthseeker said...

I agree with you on this one, Crow....

I have been saying for years that this Syrian war is nothing more than another US Proxy war for the destruction of another peaceful nation for their masters in Israel.... Everything we see so far fits the bill so neatly...

And of course we now have another false flag in Orlando... Distractions, distractions, and more distractions, for the gullible and stupid masses of ignorance....

greencrow said...

Hi NTS:

The only thing different between Syria and all the others (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine and all the South American "regime changes" is the active opposition of Russia. I guess that's what it takes.