Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Wag the BBC and other M$M "official" lies

BBC spearheaded "Assad Chemical Attack on Syrians" Hoax

NOTE: YouTube videos on this issue are being disabled almost as soon as I put them up. Yet here is the best evidence that it was BBC that continued to spread the lie that Assad was behind the chemical attack long after it was proven false. And here is the relevant quote:

Despite the official narrative on Ghouta unraveling before our eyes, some pro-Establishment Western media, including the BBC’s flagship current affairs program Newsnight, continues to assert that the chemical attack in Ghouta was carried out by the Assad government, as if it was all 100 percent proven
....
My fellow RT Op-Edge columnist Dan Glazebrook lodged an official complaint with the BBC over its broadcasting “without comment,” and with an omission of the word “allegedly,” that President Assad had used chemical weapons at Ghouta.
The BBC replied: “You are right to point out that the UN did not establish that the Syrian government was responsible…. Nevertheless a number of governments concluded that the Syrian government was responsible.”The governments the BBC referred to were of course those who were itching for an excuse to bomb Syria, namely the US, the UK and France.

Two of the biggest professional liars in the business have been caught lying again.  RT in a video referred to above, since removed from YouTube, it is shown that the BBC (Biggest and Best Calumny) was behind the useful canard that President Bashar al Assad of Syria committed a chemical attack on his own people.  It was this shopworn lie (used to death in Iraq) that led to hundreds of thousands of innocent Syrians victims in the West's ongoing efforts to topple Assad.

RT recently interviewed a Turkish MP who revealed that it was actually Turkey who provided the sarin gas rockets to ISIS who then set up the False Flag Attack later pinned on Assad.


In other False Flag news..another major media outlet was caught recently in the act of lying to its (dwindling) readership. This time, Moon of Alabama blog reports that the infamous New York Times of the "yellowcake" series of lies, used to start the War on Iraq, has been caught pushing the official version of yet another false flag. This time the NYT was pushing the San Bernardino false flag terror attack blamed on muslims:

NYT, Dec 12 2015: U.S. Visa Process Missed San Bernardino Wife’s Zealotry on Social Media
She said she supported it. And she said she wanted to be a part of it.
WASHINGTON — Tashfeen Malik, who with her husband carried out the massacre in San Bernardino, Calif., passed three background checks by American immigration officials as she moved to the United States from Pakistan. None uncovered what Ms. Malik had made little effort to hide — that she talked openly on social media about her views on violent jihad.

but their lies were later refuted by none other than the FBI:

Reuters, Dec 16, 2015: FBI director: San Bernardino shooters never expressed public support for jihad on social media
Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and Tashfeen Malik, 29, expressed support for "jihad and martyrdom" in private communications but never did so on social media, Comey said at a press conference in New York City.
FBI Director James Comey said on Wednesday that there remains no evidence the couple who massacred 14 people in San Bernardino, California, on December 2 were part of an organized cell or had any contact with overseas militant groups.

The BBC and the New York times don't NEED to check their sources. Why? Because they're not journalists...they're professional mouthpieces and when you're a mouthpiece...you say what you're TOLD to say.

No comments: